The vivo V19 (Indonesia) and Oppo Reno Z represent a fascinating crossroads in the mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aimed to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they took different approaches to achieving that goal. The V19 leans on Qualcomm's Snapdragon 675, while the Reno Z opts for MediaTek's Helio P90. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a smoother experience, the Oppo Reno Z emerges as the better choice. Its Helio P90 chipset, built on a smaller 12nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo V19, especially in demanding tasks. The 20W charging also offers a quicker top-up.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 10. Released 2020, March 26 | 2019, May. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) | 157.3 x 74.9 x 9.1 mm (6.19 x 2.95 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | HTML |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 360 h (2G) / Up to 435 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 6 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4035 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Crystal White | Jet Black, Aurora Purple - EuropeStar Purple, Extreme Night Black, Coral Orange, Bead White - China |
| Models | - | PCDM10, CPH1979 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -86.6dB / Crosstalk -86.8dB |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 67dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 74dB |
vivo V19 (Indonesia)
- Established brand presence in Indonesia
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 offers reliable performance
- Likely a more conservative software experience
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Reno Z
- Potentially lower image processing quality
Oppo Reno Z
- More powerful MediaTek Helio P90 chipset
- Faster 20W wired charging
- Potentially better image processing capabilities
- MediaTek chipsets sometimes have less consistent software support
- May experience more aggressive battery optimization
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. The absence of detailed display specs necessitates a focus on processing power impacting UI smoothness. While both will likely offer adequate viewing experiences, the Reno Z’s more capable chipset will contribute to a more responsive user interface and smoother animations, indirectly enhancing the perceived display quality.
Camera Comparison
The provided data only indicates that the Oppo Reno Z has a 'Photo / Video' camera. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Reno Z’s stronger processing capabilities suggest it will likely deliver better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The V19’s Snapdragon 675 ISP is capable, but the P90’s image signal processor benefits from the chipset’s overall performance advantage. We can assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but the Reno Z is likely to offer more refined image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno Z’s MediaTek Helio P90 (12nm) features a more aggressive CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 cores compared to the vivo V19’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) with 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold cores. The P90’s Cortex-A75 cores offer a significant architectural advantage, translating to faster single-core performance. While the Snapdragon 675 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations, the P90’s 12nm process generally leads to better efficiency and sustained performance under load. This means the Reno Z is more likely to maintain higher frame rates in games and handle multitasking without significant slowdowns.
Battery Life
The vivo V19 supports 18W wired charging, while the Oppo Reno Z steps it up to 20W. While the difference isn’t massive, 20W will demonstrably reduce charging times. Without knowing the battery capacities of each device, it’s difficult to assess overall battery life. However, the Helio P90’s improved efficiency could partially offset a potentially smaller battery in the Reno Z, resulting in comparable real-world usage. The faster charging speed of the Reno Z is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 (Indonesia) if you prioritize a well-established brand reputation within the Indonesian market and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light web browsing. Buy the Oppo Reno Z if you prefer a more powerful processor for gaming and multitasking, and value faster charging speeds for minimizing downtime. The Reno Z is the better option for users who push their phones a bit harder.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P90 in the Oppo Reno Z overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Helio P90 is a capable chipset, it can generate heat under sustained load. However, Oppo typically implements thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating. Expect some throttling after extended gaming, but the Reno Z should generally provide a playable experience. The 12nm process helps with thermal efficiency compared to older nodes.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo V19 sufficient for playing popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 675 can run PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It’s not a gaming-focused chipset, so don’t expect the highest performance. The Reno Z’s Helio P90 will provide a significantly better gaming experience with higher frame rates and more consistent performance.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno Z support VOOC charging, and how long does it take to fully charge?
The Oppo Reno Z supports 20W wired charging, which is based on Oppo’s VOOC technology. A full charge from 0% to 100% will likely take around 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours, depending on the battery capacity. This is faster than the vivo V19’s 18W charging.
