The vivo V17 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a balanced experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The V17 prioritizes processing power with the Snapdragon 675, while the Moto G8 Plus focuses on endurance and a respectable display. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional gaming, the vivo V17 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 675 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Moto G8 Plus’s Snapdragon 665. While the Moto G8 Plus boasts comparable battery life, the V17’s slightly faster charging and superior processing make it the more well-rounded device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 23. Released 2019, December | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Admiral Blue, Glacier Ice White, Midnight Ocean Black | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | 1919 | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.25 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V17
- More powerful Snapdragon 675 processor
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Likely superior camera image processing
- Display specifications are unknown
- Potentially higher price point
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- Excellent 87-hour battery endurance
- Bright 581 nit display for outdoor use
- Competitive price
- Less powerful Snapdragon 665 processor
- Slower 15W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus features a display capable of reaching 581 nits of peak brightness, a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. While both phones share a 1505:1 contrast ratio, the V17’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given the V17’s positioning, it likely prioritizes color accuracy over sheer brightness. The G8 Plus’s higher brightness is a clear win for users who spend a lot of time outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having a 'Photo' camera, which is unhelpful. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, given the market positioning, the V17 likely features a more sophisticated camera system. The focus should be on the main sensor size and aperture. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a significant advantage, but this information is unavailable. It's reasonable to assume the V17's image processing algorithms are more advanced, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Moto G8 Plus likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor.
Performance
The vivo V17’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) represents a clear step up in performance compared to the Moto G8 Plus’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 675 utilizes Kryo 460 Gold cores clocked at 2.0 GHz alongside Kryo 460 Silver cores at 1.7 GHz, while the 665 features Kryo 260 Gold cores at 2.0 GHz and Kryo 260 Silver cores at 1.8 GHz. The architectural improvements and higher clock speeds in the 675 translate to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The V17 will handle graphically intensive games with fewer stutters and at higher settings. The 665 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the vivo V17 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus achieve an endurance rating of 87 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the V17 offers 18W wired charging, while the Moto G8 Plus is limited to 15W. This means the V17 will recharge faster, reducing downtime. While the difference isn’t massive, the 18W charging provides a slight convenience advantage. The similar endurance ratings suggest both phones can comfortably last a full day on a single charge with moderate use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V17 if you frequently multitask, enjoy mobile gaming, or need a phone that feels snappy and responsive. Its stronger processor will handle demanding apps and provide a smoother user experience. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if battery life is your absolute top priority and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media. The G8 Plus offers excellent endurance and a bright display for everyday use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 665 is a capable chip for casual gaming, but it will likely require lower graphics settings and frame rates in demanding titles like PUBG Mobile to maintain a smooth experience. Expect occasional frame drops and longer loading times compared to the vivo V17.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo V17 with the 18W charger?
While a precise time isn't available, the 18W charging on the vivo V17 should fully charge the battery in approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours, depending on the battery's initial charge level. This is faster than the Moto G8 Plus's 15W charging.
❓ Is the camera on the Moto G8 Plus good enough for social media photos?
The Moto G8 Plus's camera is adequate for social media photos in good lighting conditions. However, expect limited detail and dynamic range in low-light scenarios. The V17 likely offers superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo V17 offer a noticeable improvement in multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 665?
Yes, the Snapdragon 675's more powerful CPU and improved architecture provide a noticeable improvement in multitasking. You'll experience faster app switching and smoother performance when running multiple applications simultaneously.
