The vivo V17 and Huawei P30 lite New Edition represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a balanced experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through different approaches to chipset design and overall feature sets. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the most value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more modern chipset architecture, the vivo V17 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 675, built on an 11nm process, offers a performance edge over the Huawei P30 lite New Edition’s Kirin 710, despite the latter’s higher clock speeds on some cores.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 20, 38 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 23. Released 2019, December | 2020, January 14. Released 2020, January 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) | 152.9 x 72.7 x 7.4 mm (6.02 x 2.86 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 152.9 g (5.40 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2312 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.15 inches, 93.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Kirin 710 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, EMUI 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Admiral Blue, Glacier Ice White, Midnight Ocean Black | Peacock Blue, Midnight Black, Pearl White, Breathing Crystal |
| Models | 1919 | Marie-L21BX, MAR-LX2B, HWV33 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.25 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V17
- More efficient Snapdragon 675 chipset
- Better sustained performance due to 11nm process
- Potentially longer battery life
- May lack some Huawei-specific software features
- Display specs are unknown and potentially average
Huawei P30 lite New Edition
- Potentially faster single-core performance
- Huawei’s EMUI software suite
- May be more readily available in certain regions
- Less efficient Kirin 710 chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- 12nm process consumes more power
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood: the Kirin 710 likely drives the P30 lite’s display, while the Snapdragon 675 powers the V17’s. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the Snapdragon 675’s image signal processor (ISP) may offer slightly better color reproduction and dynamic range when displaying photos and videos. Bezels are expected to be similar, typical of phones released in this timeframe.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 675’s ISP generally offers superior image processing capabilities. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size and lens aperture – data not provided. The P30 lite New Edition may lean towards Huawei’s signature vibrant color profiles, while the V17 might offer a more natural look. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) would be a significant advantage, but is unknown for either device.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The vivo V17’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm) and the Huawei P30 lite New Edition’s Kirin 710 (12nm) represent different architectural philosophies. While the Kirin 710 features higher clock speeds (2.2 GHz vs 2.0 GHz on the Snapdragon’s performance cores), the Snapdragon 675 benefits from a more efficient 11nm manufacturing process. This translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon’s Kryo cores, while clocked slightly lower, are generally more efficient than the Cortex-A73/A53 combination in the Kirin 710. This means the V17 is less likely to throttle during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 675 also has a more powerful GPU, offering a better gaming experience.
Battery Life
Both devices support 18W wired charging, offering comparable charging speeds. The actual 0-100% charge time will depend on battery capacity, which is not specified. However, the Snapdragon 675’s superior power efficiency means the vivo V17 is likely to deliver longer battery life on a single charge, even with a similar capacity battery. The 11nm process contributes to lower power consumption during everyday tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V17 if you need a phone that handles multitasking and moderate gaming with greater efficiency, benefiting from Qualcomm’s optimized software ecosystem. Buy the Huawei P30 lite New Edition if you prefer a potentially more responsive experience in single-threaded tasks due to the Cortex-A73 cores, and are heavily invested in the Huawei ecosystem, potentially benefiting from EMUI-specific optimizations.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo V17 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 675 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. Its Adreno 610 GPU provides sufficient graphical power for a smooth gaming experience, and the 11nm process helps prevent overheating and throttling during extended play sessions.
❓ Does the Kirin 710 in the Huawei P30 lite New Edition suffer from significant overheating during prolonged use?
The Kirin 710, built on a 12nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 675. While it can handle everyday tasks without issue, extended gaming or demanding applications may cause the phone to heat up and experience performance drops.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates and security patches?
Historically, Qualcomm-based devices often receive more consistent and timely software updates due to broader developer support. However, Huawei's update schedule can vary depending on region and carrier. It's difficult to predict definitively, but the vivo V17 may have a slight edge in this regard.