Both the vivo V17 (Russia) and Motorola Moto G8 Plus occupy a similar space in the mid-range smartphone market, relying on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset for performance. However, subtle differences in display technology, battery optimization, and charging speeds create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and slightly faster charging, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus emerges as the better choice. Its 581 nits of measured brightness and 1505:1 contrast ratio provide a more vibrant viewing experience, while the 15W charging, though modest, is still a slight edge over the vivo V17’s 18W, given their identical battery endurance ratings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, December | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.7 g (6.60 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cloud Blue, Blue Fog | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | V1945A, V1945T | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V17 (Russia)
- Potentially faster 18W charging (though impact is limited)
- Strong brand recognition in Russia
- May offer localized software features
- Lack of detailed display specifications
- Limited information on camera capabilities
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- Brighter and higher contrast display (581 nits, 1505:1)
- Clean, near-stock Android experience
- Competitive battery life (87h endurance)
- Slower 15W charging compared to vivo V17
- Camera specs lack detail
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus boasts a demonstrably superior display, achieving a measured peak brightness of 581 nits and a 1505:1 contrast ratio. While the vivo V17’s display specifications are not provided, the Moto G8 Plus’s numbers indicate a more vivid and readable screen, particularly outdoors. The contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more impactful colors. This difference will be most noticeable when consuming media or gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having a 'Photo' camera, which is insufficient for a meaningful comparison. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s impossible to determine a clear winner. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this segment is often a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. A detailed camera comparison requires more specific hardware information.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) with an identical octa-core CPU configuration (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). This means CPU performance will be virtually indistinguishable between the two. The absence of information regarding RAM type and speed prevents a deeper analysis of multitasking capabilities, but given the chipset, neither phone is expected to excel in demanding scenarios. Thermal management will likely be similar, with both devices potentially throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both the vivo V17 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus achieve an endurance rating of 87 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Moto G8 Plus offers 15W wired charging, while the vivo V17 supports 18W. While the difference is not substantial, the slightly faster charging on the vivo V17 could translate to marginally quicker top-ups, but the identical endurance rating suggests this advantage is minimal in real-world use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V17 (Russia) if you prioritize a brand with a strong presence in the Russian market and potentially benefit from localized software optimizations. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if you value a brighter, higher-contrast display and a clean, near-stock Android experience, making it ideal for users who prefer minimal bloatware and timely updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 665 in either phone struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 665 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but demanding titles like PUBG Mobile will likely require reduced graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. Expect playable performance at medium settings, but don't anticipate a flagship-level gaming experience on either device.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G8 Plus receive regular software updates and security patches?
Motorola has improved its software update cadence in recent years, but it still lags behind some competitors. The Moto G8 Plus is likely to receive at least one major Android update and regular security patches for a period of two years, but the exact timeline can vary. The near-stock Android experience generally means faster updates when they are released.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the Moto G8 Plus significantly slower than faster charging solutions found on other phones?
While 15W is not the fastest charging available, it's adequate for a phone with an 87-hour endurance rating. A full charge will take approximately 2-3 hours, which is acceptable for overnight charging. The difference between 15W and 18W is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use.
