Both the vivo V17 (Russia) and the Huawei P30 lite New Edition occupy a similar price bracket, targeting budget-conscious consumers. However, they diverge in their core hardware – Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 665 versus Huawei’s Kirin 710. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience for everyday tasks and light gaming.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more modern architecture, the vivo V17 emerges as the better choice. While the Kirin 710 boasts higher clock speeds, the Snapdragon 665’s 11nm process and Kryo cores offer a more efficient and potentially smoother experience, especially under sustained load.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 20, 38 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, December | 2020, January 14. Released 2020, January 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 152.9 x 72.7 x 7.4 mm (6.02 x 2.86 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.7 g (6.60 oz) | 152.9 g (5.40 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2312 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.15 inches, 93.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Kirin 710 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, EMUI 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cloud Blue, Blue Fog | Peacock Blue, Midnight Black, Pearl White, Breathing Crystal |
| Models | V1945A, V1945T | Marie-L21BX, MAR-LX2B, HWV33 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 360 EUR |
vivo V17 (Russia)
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Lower peak CPU clock speeds compared to Kirin 710
- May lack certain Huawei-specific software features
Huawei P30 lite New Edition
- Higher CPU clock speeds for potentially faster app launches
- Huawei’s EMUI software experience
- Potentially wider availability in certain markets
- Less power-efficient Kirin 710 chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Image processing may result in over-saturated colors
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price segment. The key difference lies in the underlying chipsets’ ability to drive the displays efficiently. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, the Snapdragon 665’s image signal processor (ISP) may offer slightly better color reproduction and image processing for content viewed on the screen. The absence of high refresh rates on both devices means users won't experience smoother scrolling or animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 665’s ISP generally offers superior image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The Kirin 710’s ISP is capable, but often leans towards more saturated colors. The presence of a dedicated AI engine in the Snapdragon 665 can further enhance scene recognition and image optimization. Users prioritizing natural-looking photos and better low-light performance will likely prefer the vivo V17. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests limited utility for serious photography.
Performance
The Kirin 710 (12nm) features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, paired with four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.7 GHz. Conversely, the Snapdragon 665 (11nm) utilizes eight Kryo 260 cores – four Gold cores at 2.0 GHz and four Silver cores at 1.8 GHz. The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 665 provides a significant advantage in power efficiency. While the Kirin 710’s A73 cores offer higher peak clock speeds, the Snapdragon’s architecture is designed for sustained performance, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. This benefits users who frequently engage in mobile gaming or run demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, offering comparable charging speeds – likely around 1.5 to 2 hours for a full charge. The actual battery life will depend on usage patterns and software optimization. The Snapdragon 665’s superior power efficiency translates to potentially longer battery life, especially during demanding tasks. Users who prioritize all-day battery life and minimize charging frequency will benefit from the vivo V17’s more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V17 (Russia) if you need a phone that handles multitasking and moderate gaming with greater efficiency, benefiting from Qualcomm’s optimized chipset. Buy the Huawei P30 lite New Edition if you prioritize potentially faster single-core performance for quick app launches and prefer Huawei’s EMUI software experience, understanding that sustained performance may be less consistent.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Kirin 710 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Kirin 710 is prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. While it can handle short gaming bursts, extended sessions may result in noticeable performance drops as the chip heats up. The Snapdragon 665 in the vivo V17 is better equipped to maintain consistent performance over longer periods due to its more efficient 11nm process.
❓ Does the vivo V17 offer any advantages for multitasking compared to the Huawei P30 lite New Edition?
Yes, the Snapdragon 665’s architecture and efficient power management provide a smoother multitasking experience. The Kryo cores are designed to handle multiple tasks concurrently without significant performance degradation, making the vivo V17 a better choice for users who frequently switch between apps.
❓ Are the 2MP macro/depth cameras on either phone worth using?
Generally, the 2MP macro and depth cameras on both phones offer limited utility. The image quality from the macro lens is often subpar, and the depth sensor’s impact on portrait mode is minimal. Users shouldn't base their purchasing decision on these sensors.
