The vivo V17 Neo and Motorola One Vision Plus represent a fascinating intersection in the budget-to-midrange smartphone space. Both devices aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches, primarily centered around their respective chipsets. This comparison dives deep into the Mediatek Helio P65 powering the V17 Neo and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 in the One Vision Plus, analyzing their impact on performance, efficiency, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent, all-day performance and a slightly more efficient chipset, the Motorola One Vision Plus edges out the vivo V17 Neo. While the V17 Neo’s Helio P65 offers a theoretical CPU clock speed advantage, the Snapdragon 665’s 11nm process and optimized architecture translate to better sustained performance and thermal management in real-world scenarios.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2020, July 10. Released 2020, July 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black brilliant, Blue Pearl | Cosmic Blue, Crystal Pink |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 170 EUR |
vivo V17 Neo
- Faster wired charging (18W)
- Potentially higher burst CPU performance
- May offer slightly lower initial price
- Less power-efficient chipset (Helio P65)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- ISP may require more aggressive image processing
Motorola One Vision Plus
- More power-efficient chipset (Snapdragon 665)
- Better sustained performance and thermal management
- Superior ISP for image processing
- Slower wired charging (15W)
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Lower peak CPU clock speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for display prowess, and specifics are missing. However, given the market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key difference will be calibration and color accuracy, which require hands-on testing. The absence of high refresh rates is expected. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely employ multi-camera setups geared towards social media sharing. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 665 is generally considered superior, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Helio P65’s ISP is capable, but typically requires more aggressive software processing to achieve comparable results. The Motorola One Vision Plus likely benefits from Qualcomm’s Hexagon DSP for faster image processing.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The vivo V17 Neo’s Mediatek Helio P65 (12nm) features a dual-cluster configuration with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Motorola One Vision Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm) with 4x 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores. The Snapdragon 665’s 11nm process gives it a significant advantage in power efficiency. While the Helio P65’s Cortex-A75 cores offer higher peak performance, the Snapdragon 665’s Kryo cores, coupled with Qualcomm’s software optimizations, provide more sustained performance and less thermal throttling. This means the Motorola One Vision Plus is likely to maintain higher frame rates for longer periods during gaming and demanding tasks. The difference in RAM speed (likely LPDDR4X in both) is negligible.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones likely feature around 4000-5000mAh batteries. The Motorola One Vision Plus’s 15W charging is slower than the vivo V17 Neo’s 18W charging. However, the Snapdragon 665’s superior power efficiency means the One Vision Plus will likely require less frequent charging, potentially offsetting the slower charging speed. The 18W charging on the V17 Neo will offer quicker top-ups, but the overall daily battery life may be shorter due to the less efficient Helio P65.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V17 Neo if you frequently engage in tasks that benefit from burst CPU performance, like quickly switching between many apps, and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life under heavy load. Buy the Motorola One Vision Plus if you prioritize consistent performance throughout the day, smoother multitasking, and a more thermally stable experience, especially during extended gaming or video playback.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P65 in the vivo V17 Neo struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P65 can run PUBG Mobile, but you may need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 665 in the Motorola One Vision Plus is likely to offer a smoother gaming experience at higher settings due to its more efficient architecture and better thermal management.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 665 in the Motorola One Vision Plus support Quick Charge technology?
The Snapdragon 665 supports Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0. However, the Motorola One Vision Plus only ships with a 15W charger, so you won't experience the full benefits of Quick Charge unless you use a compatible charger separately.
❓ Which phone is better for multitasking and switching between apps?
The Motorola One Vision Plus is better suited for multitasking. The Snapdragon 665’s optimized architecture and efficient memory management allow for smoother app switching and less lag compared to the Helio P65.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging time between 18W and 15W charging?
While 18W charging is faster, the difference isn't massive. Expect roughly a 30-60 minute difference for a full charge, depending on battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision Plus’s better power efficiency may mean you don’t need to charge as often, mitigating the slower charging speed.
