The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 200 Smart and vivo V17 Neo represent compelling options for users seeking value. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Honor 200 Smart emerges as the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset, built on a 4nm process, provides a noticeable performance and efficiency advantage over the vivo V17 Neo’s MediaTek Helio P65. The 35W charging is a game-changer, significantly reducing downtime compared to the V17 Neo’s 18W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2024, September 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, September 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.1 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 191 g or 193 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.3 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 850 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 14, Magic OS 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 35W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black brilliant, Blue Pearl | Midnight Black, Forest Green |
| Models | - | ALT-NX1 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 109.99 / £ 114.99 |
vivo V17 Neo
- Established Brand Recognition
- Potentially Lower Price Point
- Reliable Basic Functionality
- Outdated Chipset (Helio P65)
- Slower Charging (18W)
- Lower Performance
Honor 200 Smart
- Modern, Efficient Chipset (Snapdragon 4 Gen 2)
- Fast Charging (35W)
- Improved Performance and Gaming
- Less Established Brand in Some Markets
- Potentially Slightly Higher Price
- May Lack Some Software Features
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are likely 60Hz. The real difference will likely come down to color calibration and peak brightness, areas where Honor often demonstrates a slight edge. Bezels are expected to be comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market segment suggests both will feature multi-camera setups with a primary sensor and supporting lenses. The Honor 200 Smart, benefiting from its more modern chipset, likely has a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. We can expect the Honor to offer more sophisticated computational photography features. The absence of information suggests neither device will feature optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core differentiator lies in the chipsets. The Honor 200 Smart’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant leap forward from the vivo V17 Neo’s MediaTek Helio P65 (12nm). The 4nm process node translates to superior power efficiency, meaning the Honor 200 Smart will run cooler and experience less performance throttling under sustained load. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 also features newer CPU cores – Cortex-A78 versus the V17 Neo’s Cortex-A75 – offering a tangible performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. While both are octa-core designs, the Honor’s CPU clocks slightly higher (2.2 GHz vs 2.0 GHz), further contributing to its performance advantage. The Snapdragon’s integrated GPU will also provide a better gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Honor 200 Smart’s 35W wired charging is a clear advantage over the vivo V17 Neo’s 18W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times, reducing downtime and improving usability. While the actual battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency means the Honor 200 Smart will likely deliver comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar or even slightly smaller battery capacity than the V17 Neo. The faster charging is a critical benefit for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V17 Neo if you prioritize a familiar, established brand and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. You'll accept slower performance and charging in exchange for potentially lower cost. Buy the Honor 200 Smart if you value performance, faster charging, and a more modern chipset architecture, even if it means opting for a less-established brand in some markets. This is the better choice for users who enjoy mobile gaming or multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Honor 200 Smart handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While not a flagship-level gaming chip, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 4nm process and improved GPU compared to the Helio P65 in the V17 Neo will provide a smoother and more consistent gaming experience, with less thermal throttling.
❓ How much faster is the 35W charging on the Honor 200 Smart compared to the 18W charging on the vivo V17 Neo?
The 35W charging on the Honor 200 Smart will significantly reduce charging times. Expect a 0-100% charge in approximately 60-75 minutes, compared to potentially 90-120 minutes on the vivo V17 Neo. This difference is particularly noticeable for quick top-ups throughout the day.
❓ Does the Helio P65 in the vivo V17 Neo struggle with multitasking?
The Helio P65 is a capable processor for basic multitasking, but it can exhibit slowdowns when running multiple demanding apps simultaneously. The Honor 200 Smart’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 will handle multitasking more efficiently due to its newer architecture and higher performance.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. While both phones will handle basic tasks, the Honor 200 Smart will feel snappier and more responsive when switching between apps, loading web pages, and scrolling through social media feeds. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 provides a smoother overall user experience.
