The smartphone market is overflowing with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the vivo V15 Pro, a device known for its impressive endurance, and the Samsung Galaxy A54, a modern mid-range powerhouse. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which phone comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the overall winner. While the V15 Pro boasts incredible endurance ratings, the A54's superior chipset, brighter display, and more modern features make it a more compelling choice for most users. It offers a better balance of performance and features.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, March | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.3 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 99.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 24% in 15 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 3700 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Topaz Blue, Coral Red, Ruby Red | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | 1818, vivo 1818 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.2dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 92h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: infinite, 3.806 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 65dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 83dB
|
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 180774 (v7)
GeekBench: 6527 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.2dB | - |
| Battery | - | Active use score 11:15h |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 92h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: infinite, 3.806 (sunlight) | 980 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 65dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 83dB | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 180774 (v7)
GeekBench: 6527 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V15 Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (rated)
- Very bright display in sunlight
- Compact design (likely)
- Outdated chipset
- Lower performance compared to competitors
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Slower charging speed
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Modern chipset with strong performance
- Bright and vibrant AMOLED display
- Excellent camera system
- Long battery life
- Faster charging
- Can be slightly more expensive
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown. While the V15 Pro's contrast ratio is technically 'infinite' (likely a marketing term), the A54's measured 980 nits max brightness is a significant advantage, especially outdoors. The A54's display is also likely to have better color accuracy and viewing angles, typical of Samsung's AMOLED panels. The V15 Pro's display, while bright, is likely an LCD and may lack the vibrancy of the A54.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Galaxy A54 is expected to have a superior camera system. Samsung consistently delivers strong camera performance in its mid-range devices. Expect better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance from the A54. The V15 Pro's camera is likely adequate but won't match the A54's capabilities.
Performance
The Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset (5nm) significantly outperforms the V15 Pro's Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The newer architecture and smaller manufacturing process translate to faster processing speeds, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The A54's CPU configuration also offers a more balanced approach to performance.
Battery Life
The vivo V15 Pro initially appears to win with its 92h endurance rating. However, the Galaxy A54's 119h rating is higher. Furthermore, the A54's active use score of 11:15h suggests a more realistic and usable battery life for everyday tasks. The A54 also supports 25W charging, slightly faster than the V15 Pro's 18W.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V15 Pro? Users prioritizing extreme battery life and a very bright display in direct sunlight might find value. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Those seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a modern design, strong performance, a vibrant display, and a capable camera system will be happier with the A54.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo V15 Pro still a good phone in 2024?
The V15 Pro's battery life remains impressive, but its outdated chipset and camera hold it back. It's a viable option for those on a very tight budget prioritizing battery, but newer phones offer significantly better value.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 will receive longer software and security updates compared to the vivo V15 Pro, which is likely nearing the end of its support cycle.
