The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo T4x, powered by the newer Mediatek Dimensity 7300, enters the arena challenging the established OnePlus Nord CE 5G, which utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the most compelling experience for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo T4x emerges as the stronger contender. Its more modern Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a significant performance advantage over the Snapdragon 750G’s 8nm architecture. While both phones boast similar battery endurance ratings, the T4x’s faster 44W charging provides a quicker top-up.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 05 | 2021, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 12 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.3 x 8.1 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 159.2 x 73.5 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g or 208 g (7.20 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (HBM) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 40 min
Reverse wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pronto Purple, Marine Blue | Blue Void, Charkoal Ink, Silver Ray |
| Models | V2437 | EB2101, EB2103 |
| Price | ₹ 14,499 | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.9 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318672 (v8) | 391770 (v9)
GeekBench: 1812 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T4x
- More powerful Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Faster 44W charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Camera details are limited
OnePlus Nord CE 5G
- Established brand reputation (OnePlus)
- Respectable peak display brightness (607 nits)
- Solid all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Older Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Slower 30W charging
- No reverse charging
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 607 nits, which is respectable for outdoor visibility. However, the vivo T4x’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Given the T4x’s more recent release, it’s reasonable to expect comparable or potentially superior brightness. Both devices feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term that doesn’t necessarily translate to a dramatically better viewing experience. Without knowing the panel technology used in the T4x (e.g., AMOLED vs. LCD), it’s hard to assess color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s likely both phones will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will heavily depend on sensor size and image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo T4x’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the OnePlus Nord CE 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm). The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling under sustained load. The Dimensity 7300’s octa-core configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a higher peak clock speed and utilizes more powerful Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Snapdragon 750G’s (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570). This will result in noticeably faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the T4x.
Battery Life
Both the vivo T4x and OnePlus Nord CE 5G achieve an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life. However, the T4x’s 44W wired charging is significantly faster than the Nord CE 5G’s 30W charging. The T4x can reach 50% charge in 40 minutes, while the Nord CE 5G requires 30 minutes to reach 70%. The T4x also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Nord CE 5G, allowing it to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T4x if you prioritize raw processing power for gaming and multitasking, and value faster charging speeds. This phone is ideal for users who frequently switch between demanding apps or enjoy mobile gaming. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 5G if you prefer a brand with a more established software ecosystem and are less concerned with having the absolute latest chipset. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks and media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7300 in the vivo T4x handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Dimensity 7300 is a capable chipset that should handle Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. The 4nm process and Cortex-A78 cores provide the necessary processing power, but sustained performance will depend on the phone's thermal management.
❓ How does the charging speed of the vivo T4x compare to real-world usage? Will 44W charging significantly reduce downtime?
44W charging is considerably faster than 30W. While the advertised 50% in 40 minutes is a best-case scenario, you can expect a full charge in approximately 60-75 minutes, significantly reducing downtime compared to the Nord CE 5G's slower charging speed.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the vivo T4x a cause for concern?
It's a valid concern. However, vivo often focuses on computational photography. While sensor size and aperture are important, the image processing algorithms play a crucial role in the final image quality. We'll need to wait for independent reviews to assess the T4x's camera performance.
