The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T4R and Samsung Galaxy A73 5G represent compelling options for users seeking 5G connectivity without a flagship price tag. This comparison dissects their core components – from chipsets and charging speeds to overall user experience – to determine which device offers the most bang for your buck.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the vivo T4R emerges as the winner. Its newer Dimensity 7400 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, provides a noticeable edge over the Galaxy A73 5G’s Snapdragon 778G. However, Samsung’s software and brand recognition remain strong considerations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 31 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 05 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.7 x 7.4 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.29 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.5 g (6.49 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired
Bypass charging | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic White, Twilight Blue | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | - | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | ₹ 19,830 | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
vivo T4R
- Faster charging with 44W support
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7400 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Less established brand recognition
- Software experience may not be as refined as Samsung's
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Well-regarded Samsung software experience
- Strong brand reputation and ecosystem
- Reliable and consistent performance
- Slower 25W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Potentially lower battery life due to less efficient chipset
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing, both likely feature FHD+ panels common in this price bracket. The key difference lies in the underlying chipsets’ ability to drive those displays efficiently. The Galaxy A73 5G’s older Snapdragon 778G might show slightly more strain during graphically intensive tasks, potentially leading to minor frame drops. Without knowing the panel technology (AMOLED vs LCD) it's difficult to assess color accuracy, but Samsung generally excels in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the chipset plays a crucial role in image processing. The Dimensity 7400’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more advanced, enabling faster processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Galaxy A73 5G benefits from Samsung’s well-regarded image processing algorithms, known for vibrant colors. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS makes it difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the T4R’s more powerful chipset gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The vivo T4R’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration, featuring four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, offers a significant uplift over the Snapdragon 778G’s (6nm) single 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and three 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 7400 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, meaning sustained performance under load will be superior. While the Snapdragon 778G remains a capable chip, the T4R will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease. The T4R's CPU architecture is more modern, offering better IPC (Instructions Per Clock) for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not provided for either device, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the vivo T4R’s 44W wired charging is a substantial advantage over the Galaxy A73 5G’s 25W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times – potentially reducing a full charge from over an hour on the Samsung to under an hour on the vivo. The Dimensity 7400’s 4nm efficiency also contributes to better battery life, as it consumes less power during operation. Even with a similar battery capacity, the T4R is likely to last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T4R if you need a phone that excels in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking, and if rapid charging is a priority. Its 44W charging significantly reduces downtime. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you prefer a more established brand with a refined software experience and a potentially wider ecosystem of accessories, and if you value a consistent, reliable performance profile over peak power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7400 in the vivo T4R handle demanding games like Genshin Impact smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 7400’s powerful CPU and GPU, combined with its 4nm efficiency, are well-suited for running demanding games like Genshin Impact. Expect playable frame rates at medium to high settings, with less throttling compared to the Snapdragon 778G.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the vivo T4R compared to the 25W charging on the Galaxy A73 5G?
The 44W charging on the vivo T4R will significantly reduce charging times. While exact figures depend on battery capacity, expect a full charge to take approximately 60-75 minutes on the T4R, compared to potentially 90-120 minutes on the Galaxy A73 5G.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy A73 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is generally a thermally efficient chip, but it can experience some throttling during extended gaming sessions. The 6nm process helps, but the Dimensity 7400’s 4nm process offers superior thermal performance, making the T4R the better choice for marathon gaming.
