The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T4R and Oppo Reno10 Pro+ represent compelling options. The T4R aims for strong value with a modern Dimensity chipset, while the Reno10 Pro+ brings a flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 to a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno10 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers significantly higher performance, crucial for demanding tasks and gaming. While the vivo T4R offers respectable performance and faster charging, the Reno10 Pro+'s raw power and feature set justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 31 | 2023, May 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 05 | Available. Released 2023, May 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.7 x 7.4 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.29 in) | 162.9 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.41 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.5 g (6.49 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.5, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired
Bypass charging | 100W wired, PD, QC3
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5700 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic White, Twilight Blue | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple, Gold |
| Models | - | PHU110, CPH2521 |
| Price | ₹ 19,830 | About 540 EUR |
vivo T4R
- More affordable price point
- 44W wired and reverse wired charging
- Bypass charging for cooler gaming
- Dimensity 7400 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Likely less advanced camera system
Oppo Reno10 Pro+
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- 100W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Likely superior camera system with OIS
- Higher price tag
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Reno10 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features an AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate and potentially LTPO technology for variable refresh rate efficiency. The T4R, being more budget-focused, likely uses a standard AMOLED panel with a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate. The Reno10 Pro+ likely boasts higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy due to its flagship status. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the Reno10 Pro+ may have a slight edge in overall display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, we can only speculate. The Reno10 Pro+ is likely to feature a larger main sensor with OIS, enabling better low-light performance and image stabilization. Oppo typically focuses on computational photography, so expect strong image processing. The T4R will likely have a capable camera system, but it will likely lack the advanced features and sensor size of the Reno10 Pro+. The Reno10 Pro+'s image processing pipeline will likely prioritize detail and dynamic range, while the T4R may lean towards more saturated colors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno10 Pro+’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant step up from the vivo T4R’s Dimensity 7400 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 performance cores, offering substantially higher single-core and multi-core performance. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture is more efficient and powerful. The T4R’s Dimensity 7400, with its Cortex-A78 cores, is still capable, but will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications compared to the Reno10 Pro+. The Reno10 Pro+ also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Reno10 Pro+’s 100W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, capable of fully charging the device in under 30 minutes. The T4R’s 44W charging is respectable, but significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Reno10 Pro+'s faster charging mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Reno10 Pro+ also supports PD and QC3 standards, offering wider compatibility with chargers. The T4R’s bypass charging feature is a useful addition, allowing for direct power delivery while charging, reducing heat buildup during gaming.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T4R if you prioritize affordability and efficient power management for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. Its 44W charging is a practical benefit for frequent top-ups. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro+ if you demand flagship-level performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value the faster 100W SuperVOOC charging for minimal downtime.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Reno10 Pro+ overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, it can generate heat under sustained load. Oppo likely employs advanced cooling solutions, such as vapor chamber cooling, to mitigate throttling. However, users playing graphically demanding games for extended periods may experience some performance reduction over time. The T4R's Dimensity 7400 will likely run cooler, but at the cost of overall performance.
❓ Does the vivo T4R's 44W charging feel slow compared to the Reno10 Pro+'s 100W charging?
Yes, the difference is substantial. 44W charging is adequate for overnight charging or topping up while not in use, but 100W charging can add a significant percentage of battery life in just a few minutes. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly recharge, the Reno10 Pro+'s charging speed is a major advantage.
❓ Is the Dimensity 7400 in the vivo T4R capable of running popular games like PUBG Mobile and Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Dimensity 7400 can run PUBG Mobile and Genshin Impact, but you may need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate, especially in Genshin Impact. The Reno10 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 will provide a significantly smoother experience at higher graphics settings.
