The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T4R and Oppo Reno10 Pro represent compelling options. The T4R brings a newer chipset in the Mediatek Dimensity 7400, while the Reno10 Pro counters with faster 80W charging and a proven Snapdragon 778G platform. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and proven reliability, the Oppo Reno10 Pro is the better choice. Its 80W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 778G offers a stable, well-optimized experience. However, the vivo T4R’s Dimensity 7400 holds potential for slightly better long-term performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 31 | 2023, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 05 | Available. Released 2023, July 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.7 x 7.4 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.29 in) | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.5 g (6.49 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired
Bypass charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC3
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5700 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic White, Twilight Blue | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple |
| Models | - | CPH2525 |
| Price | ₹ 19,830 | € 229.99 / ₹ 31,999 |
vivo T4R
- Newer Dimensity 7400 chipset offers potential for better performance.
- 4nm process should improve thermal efficiency.
- Bypass charging allows use while charging.
- Slower 44W charging.
- Camera performance is unproven.
- Display brightness is unknown.
Oppo Reno10 Pro
- 80W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Proven Snapdragon 778G platform offers stable performance.
- Excellent battery life (11:05h active use).
- 6nm process is less efficient than the T4R’s 4nm.
- Chipset is older generation.
- May lack the long-term performance potential of the Dimensity 7400.
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 793 nits, a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo T4R. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Reno10 Pro’s higher peak brightness translates to a more vibrant and usable display in direct sunlight. Details regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming are missing for both, but the Reno10 Pro’s panel is likely tuned for color accuracy, a common strength of Oppo displays.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Oppo’s Reno series historically emphasizes camera quality and image processing. The Reno10 Pro likely benefits from Oppo’s sophisticated algorithms for portrait mode and low-light photography. The T4R’s camera performance is an unknown quantity, and its success will depend heavily on software optimization. We can assume both phones include standard features like HDR and night mode, but the Reno10 Pro likely offers a more refined experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo T4R features the Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) versus the Oppo Reno10 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (6nm). The Dimensity 7400, built on a more efficient 4nm process, *should* offer better thermal management and potentially higher sustained performance. However, the Snapdragon 778G is a mature platform with excellent software optimization. The Dimensity 7400’s CPU configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is architecturally similar to the Snapdragon 778G (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55), but the newer process node gives the T4R an edge. The Snapdragon 778G’s Adreno 642L GPU is a known performer, and the Dimensity 7400’s Mali-G610 MC4 will need real-world testing to determine its comparative gaming prowess.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno10 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a clear advantage, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the vivo T4R’s 44W charging. The Reno10 Pro’s endurance rating of 104 hours and active use score of 11:05h suggest excellent battery life. While the T4R’s battery capacity is unknown, the Reno10 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The inclusion of bypass charging on the T4R is a useful feature, allowing for charging while the phone is in use, but it doesn’t compensate for the Reno10 Pro’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T4R if you prioritize future-proofing with a newer chipset and potentially better sustained performance during demanding tasks. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask or play graphically intensive games and don’t mind slightly slower charging. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro if you value a consistently smooth experience, exceptionally fast charging, and a longer track record of software optimization. This phone is perfect for users who prioritize convenience and battery life over raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7400 in the vivo T4R overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7400’s 4nm process is designed to mitigate thermal throttling. However, without detailed thermal testing, it’s difficult to say definitively. The Reno10 Pro’s Snapdragon 778G is a well-established performer with predictable thermal behavior, making it a safer bet for extended gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Oppo Reno10 Pro compared to the 44W charging on the vivo T4R?
The 80W charging on the Reno10 Pro will significantly reduce charging times. Expect a full charge in approximately 30-40 minutes, while the T4R will likely take over an hour. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Oppo Reno10 Pro still hold up in 2024 for demanding apps and games?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 778G remains a capable chipset for most tasks in 2024. While not the absolute fastest, it provides a smooth and responsive experience for everyday use, social media, and even many graphically intensive games at medium settings.
❓ Is the bypass charging feature on the vivo T4R useful in real-world scenarios?
Bypass charging is beneficial for users who need to use their phone while it's charging, such as during long gaming sessions or video calls. However, it can generate more heat and potentially reduce battery lifespan over time.
