vivo T4 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing blazing-fast charging and peak performance in short bursts, the vivo T4 is the clear winner. Its 90W charging significantly outperforms the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W, and the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 offers a performance edge. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in sustained battery life and offers a more balanced overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T4 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 22 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.4 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PPS, 44W UFCS, 50% in 33 min 7.5W reverse wired Bypass Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Emerald Blaze, Phantom Grey | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2502 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 20,700 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo T4
- Ultra-fast 90W charging
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
- Reverse wired charging and bypass charging
- Battery life likely shorter than Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness not specified, potentially lower than competitor
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Balanced performance profile
- Slower charging speed (68W)
- Dimensity 7030 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits, which translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo T4. While the T4’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor users. Both devices likely employ AMOLED panels, common in this segment, but the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness is a clear differentiator. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified, making it difficult to assess further display quality differences.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without knowing the sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s inclusion of photo and video capabilities suggests a well-rounded camera system, but the absence of details prevents a thorough analysis. The T4’s camera is similarly undefined. We can assume both phones will feature standard features like HDR and night mode, but image quality will ultimately depend on sensor quality and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The vivo T4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm) and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) represent different approaches to performance. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 generally offers better power efficiency and thermal management than the 6nm Dimensity 7030. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration – 1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 – appears more potent than the Dimensity 7030’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, real-world performance will depend on software optimization and thermal throttling. The Snapdragon’s architecture suggests a stronger showing in CPU-intensive tasks, while the Dimensity 7030 may excel in certain AI-driven applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80h demonstrate a significant advantage in battery life. While the vivo T4’s battery capacity is not specified, its 90W wired charging (with 55W PPS and 44W UFCS support) is a standout feature, capable of charging to 50% in just 33 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging reaches 50% in 15 minutes, still fast, but considerably slower. The T4 also offers 7.5W reverse wired charging and bypass charging, features absent in the Edge 40 Neo. The trade-off is clear: the T4 prioritizes charging speed, while the Edge 40 Neo focuses on maximizing runtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T4 if you need the absolute fastest charging available in this price bracket and frequently engage in demanding tasks like mobile gaming or video editing, even if it means slightly shorter battery life. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a more refined software experience, and a consistently smooth performance profile over outright peak power.