vivo T4 vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing speed, gaming, and incredibly fast charging, the vivo T4 is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7a excels in computational photography, software experience, and offers a more polished overall package, making it ideal for those valuing camera quality and seamless Google integration.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T4 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 22 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 29 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.4 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PPS, 44W UFCS, 50% in 33 min 7.5W reverse wired Bypass Charging | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7300 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Emerald Blaze, Phantom Grey | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | V2502 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | ₹ 20,700 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo T4
- 90W SuperCharge delivers incredibly fast charging.
- Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 offers strong gaming performance.
- Reverse wired charging adds convenience.
- Camera performance likely lags behind the Pixel 7a.
- Software updates may be less frequent than on the Pixel.
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality with Google’s computational photography.
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates.
- Tensor G2 enables AI-powered features.
- Slow 18W charging is a significant drawback.
- Tensor G2 may exhibit thermal throttling under sustained load.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the vivo T4’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be slightly dimmer. The Pixel 7a’s display technology is optimized for color accuracy and clarity, crucial for photo and video editing. The absence of LTPO on either device means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving, but the Pixel 7a’s higher peak brightness gives it a distinct advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a significant strength, leveraging Google’s computational photography prowess. While specific sensor details are missing for the vivo T4, the Pixel 7a’s image processing excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and color accuracy. The Tensor G2 chip plays a crucial role in enabling features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The absence of a dedicated telephoto lens on either device limits optical zoom capabilities, relying on digital zoom instead. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also likely superior due to the Tensor G2’s dedicated image signal processor (ISP).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo T4’s Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a tri-cluster configuration with a prime Cortex-A720 core clocked at 2.5 GHz, designed for sustained performance. The Pixel 7a’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) features a more complex architecture with Cortex-X1 prime cores clocked higher at 2.85 GHz, prioritizing AI tasks and machine learning. While the Tensor G2’s X1 cores offer higher peak performance, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s 4nm process and efficient core configuration may translate to better thermal management during prolonged gaming sessions. The Pixel 7a’s reliance on Tensor G2 also means it benefits from Google’s software optimizations, but may exhibit throttling under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. The vivo T4 compensates for potentially smaller battery capacity with its blazing-fast 90W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 33 minutes, utilizing PPS and UFCS standards. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging is significantly slower, taking considerably longer to fully charge. The T4 also offers 7.5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, while the Pixel 7a offers 7.5W wireless charging. The T4’s charging speed is a game-changer for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T4 if you need a phone for demanding mobile games, frequent fast charging, and aren't heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 provides a noticeable performance edge. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and benefit from Google’s AI-powered features like Magic Eraser and Call Screen. It’s the better choice for everyday users and photography enthusiasts.