vivo T4 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo T4 Pro emerges as the better choice. While the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G boasts a more powerful (though older) chipset, the T4 Pro’s superior charging speed (90W vs 33W), more efficient 4nm process, and likely software optimizations provide a more modern and convenient user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T4 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 26 | 2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 26 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 77 x 7.5 mm (6.44 x 3.03 x 0.30 in) | 165.1 x 76.4 x 9.3 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 1500 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 30mm (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD 7.5W reverse wired Bypass charging | 33W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nitro Blue, Blaze Gold | Cosmic Black, Lunar Silver, Aurora Blue |
| Models | V2510 | M2007J3SG, M2007J3SP, M2007J3SI, M2007J17C |
| Price | ₹ 27,890 | € 141.52 / £ 169.99 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 385.00 |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 415.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 564.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1185:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 563961 (v8) GeekBench: 3311 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T4 Pro
- 90W SuperCharge for incredibly fast charging
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm)
- Bypass charging for improved battery health
- Camera specifications are currently unknown
- Peak display brightness not specified
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 for demanding tasks
- High peak display brightness (630 nits)
- Excellent battery endurance (118 hours)
- Slower 33W charging
- Older 7nm+ process, potentially more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Both phones share a similar contrast ratio of 1185:1, suggesting comparable image quality in terms of blacks and whites. However, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G reaches a measured peak brightness of 630 nits, a figure the vivo T4 Pro’s display specifications don’t directly address. This suggests the Mi 10T Pro may be more visible in direct sunlight. Without knowing the panel technology used in the T4 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles, but the newer device may benefit from advancements in display calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the market trend suggests the T4 Pro, being a newer device, may incorporate more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor, despite the lack of detailed specifications. The absence of information regarding OIS on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) was a flagship processor in its time, featuring a Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz. However, the vivo T4 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) utilizes a more modern architecture with a Cortex-720 prime core at 2.8 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 offers significantly improved power efficiency compared to the 7nm+ node of the 865, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While the 865 may win in peak performance, the 7 Gen 4 is likely to provide a smoother, more consistent experience over extended use.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the vivo T4 Pro compensates with significantly faster 90W wired charging, a substantial upgrade over the Mi 10T Pro’s 33W charging. This means the T4 Pro can replenish its battery much quicker, mitigating any potential disadvantage in raw battery capacity. The T4 Pro also includes bypass charging, allowing it to charge directly without heating up the battery, further extending its lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T4 Pro if you prioritize fast charging, long-term software support, and a more power-efficient processor for all-day use. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G if you absolutely need the highest possible raw performance for demanding tasks like video editing or consistently pushing high frame rates in graphically intensive games, and are willing to compromise on charging speed and potentially battery longevity.