vivo T4 Pro vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses

The smartphone landscape is littered with compelling mid-range options, but two stand out as particularly strong contenders: the recently released vivo T4 Pro and the older, yet still capable, Realme X50 Pro 5G. This comparison dives deep into their specifications, performance, and features to determine which device offers the best experience for your needs, especially considering the T4 Pro's newer chipset and charging tech versus the X50 Pro's established reputation and potentially lower price point.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users in 2024, the vivo T4 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, delivers strong performance with improved thermal management, coupled with blazing-fast 90W charging. While the Realme X50 Pro 5G still holds its own, its older Snapdragon 865 is less efficient and the T4 Pro's advancements offer a more future-proof experience.

PHONES
Phone Names	vivo T4 Pro	Realme X50 Pro 5G

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	-	41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India

Launch
Announced	2025, August 26	2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05
Status	Available. Released 2025, August 26	Discontinued

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions	163.5 x 77 x 7.5 mm (6.44 x 3.03 x 0.30 in)	159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	192 g (6.77 oz)	205 g (7.23 oz)

Display
Protection	Diamond Shield Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size	6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio)	6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 1500 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak)	Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520)	Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm)	Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)
GPU	Adreno 722	Adreno 650
OS	Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15	Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
	-	UFS 3.0

Main Camera
Features	Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR	LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad	-	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens
Triple	50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom Auxiliary lens	-
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS	4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Dual	-	32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Features	-	HDR
Single	32 MP, f/2.5, 30mm (wide)	-
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps	1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS

Sound
3.5mm jack	-	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with dual speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.4, A2DP, LE	5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared port	Yes	-
NFC	No	Yes
Positioning	GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	90W wired, PD 7.5W reverse wired Bypass charging	65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min
Type	Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh	4200 mAh

Misc
Colors	Nitro Blue, Blaze Gold	Moss Green, Rust Red
Models	V2510	RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076
Price	₹ 27,890	About 360 EUR
SAR	0.99 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body)	-

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 90h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-23.2 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo T4 Pro

More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset
Ultra-fast 90W wired charging
Reverse wired charging and bypass charging

Display specifications are unknown
Camera details are limited

Realme X50 Pro 5G

Proven Snapdragon 865 performance
Established user base and reviews
Respectable 635 nits peak brightness

Less power-efficient chipset
Slower 65W charging
Older technology

Display Comparison

The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a display capable of reaching 635 nits of peak brightness, a respectable figure, but the context data lacks specifics on the vivo T4 Pro’s display. Given the T4 Pro’s newer release, it’s likely to feature advancements in color accuracy and potentially higher peak brightness. Both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels. However, without PWM dimming frequency data for the T4 Pro, it’s difficult to assess potential eye strain differences. The X50 Pro’s larger established user base provides more real-world feedback on its display quality.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the T4 Pro’s newer release, it’s reasonable to expect improvements in image processing algorithms and potentially a more advanced camera system. The X50 Pro’s camera performance is well-documented by reviewers, but the T4 Pro likely benefits from advancements in computational photography. We can assume both phones will offer a competent camera experience, but the T4 Pro likely has an edge in low-light performance and dynamic range.

Performance

This is where the most significant difference lies. The vivo T4 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) is architecturally superior to the Realme X50 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The 4nm process node translates to significantly improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, meaning the T4 Pro is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While the Snapdragon 865 still offers strong raw performance – its Cortex-A77 cores clock slightly higher at 2.84 GHz versus the T4 Pro’s 2.8 GHz Cortex-720 – the T4 Pro’s more balanced core configuration (1x Cortex-720, 4x Cortex-720, 3x Cortex-520) and newer architecture provide a more consistent experience. The T4 Pro benefits from newer CPU core designs, improving IPC (Instructions Per Clock).

Battery Life

Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the difference in chipsets. However, the T4 Pro’s 90W wired charging is a game-changer, promising significantly faster charging times than the X50 Pro’s 65W charging (which takes 35 minutes for a full charge). The T4 Pro also includes 7.5W reverse wired charging and bypass charging, features absent in the X50 Pro. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4’s improved efficiency further contributes to the T4 Pro’s battery performance, potentially offsetting any capacity differences not specified in the data.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo T4 Pro if you prioritize long-term performance, efficient power usage, and incredibly fast charging. It's ideal for users who frequently game, stream media, or simply want a phone that can keep up with a demanding lifestyle. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you can find it at a significantly discounted price and value raw processing power for specific tasks, and are willing to accept slightly lower battery efficiency and slower charging speeds. It remains a viable option for those on a tight budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 in the vivo T4 Pro handle demanding games like Genshin Impact well?

Yes, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't match the performance of flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen series chips, it can comfortably run Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 4nm process also helps to minimize thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.

❓ Is the 65W charging on the Realme X50 Pro 5G still considered fast in 2024?

While 65W charging was considered fast when the X50 Pro 5G was released, it's now surpassed by faster charging technologies like the 90W charging on the vivo T4 Pro. 65W still provides a full charge in a reasonable 35 minutes, but the T4 Pro offers a significantly quicker top-up.

❓ How does the thermal management of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 compare to the Snapdragon 865 under heavy load?

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, built on a 4nm process, exhibits significantly better thermal management than the Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The smaller process node generates less heat, reducing the likelihood of thermal throttling and maintaining consistent performance during prolonged intensive tasks like gaming or video recording.

❓ What is 'bypass charging' on the vivo T4 Pro and why is it useful?

Bypass charging allows you to power the phone directly from the charger, bypassing the battery. This reduces heat buildup during gaming or other demanding tasks while charging, potentially extending the battery's lifespan. It's a useful feature for users who frequently game or use their phone heavily while plugged in.