The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T4 Lite and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro represent compelling options. The T4 Lite aims for efficiency with a Mediatek Dimensity 6300, while the Poco X5 Pro leverages the proven Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers noticeably better performance, especially in gaming, and the 67W fast charging is a significant advantage over the T4 Lite’s 15W charging. While the T4 Lite offers a respectable experience, the Poco X5 Pro provides a more premium feel and feature set.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 24 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 02 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Blue, Titanium Gold | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2509 | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| SAR | 0.91 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T4 Lite
- Potentially better power efficiency with Dimensity 6300
- Likely more affordable price point
- Clean and streamlined software experience (typical of vivo)
- Significantly slower charging speed (15W)
- Less powerful chipset for gaming and demanding tasks
- Display brightness likely lower than Poco X5 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 778G 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with multiple protocols
- Brighter and more vibrant display (912 nits)
- Potentially slightly lower battery efficiency
- May have more pre-installed bloatware (typical of Xiaomi)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 912 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the T4 Lite. This makes the Poco X5 Pro far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher peak brightness of the Poco X5 Pro translates to a more vivid and engaging viewing experience. The T4 Lite’s display specifications are currently limited, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel technology difficult, but the Poco X5 Pro’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited for both. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 778G’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance on the Poco X5 Pro. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value. The Poco X5 Pro’s ISP is more likely to support advanced features like 4K video recording at higher frame rates.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) features a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 2.4 GHz, alongside three additional A78 cores at 2.2 GHz, offering a substantial performance advantage over the vivo T4 Lite’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Dimensity 6300 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. While both are 6nm chips, the architectural differences and core configuration favor the Snapdragon 778G, particularly in sustained workloads and gaming. The Poco X5 Pro is likely to exhibit less throttling under prolonged stress. The Poco X5 Pro also benefits from potentially faster RAM options (LPDDR5x is common in this tier) which the T4 Lite's specs do not specify.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the T4 Lite’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 45 minutes. The T4 Lite’s 15W charging is considerably slower. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Poco X5 Pro adds a convenient feature for topping up accessories, absent on the T4 Lite. The faster charging speed of the Poco X5 Pro significantly reduces downtime and enhances usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T4 Lite if you prioritize a streamlined, efficient experience and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light communication. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you value performance for gaming and demanding applications, appreciate faster charging speeds, and want a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Poco X5 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is known for its relatively efficient thermal management. While some heat is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Poco X5 Pro’s cooling system (details unspecified) should prevent significant throttling. Expect playable frame rates even after 30-60 minutes of demanding games.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the vivo T4 Lite sufficient for daily use?
While 15W charging isn't *unusable*, it's considerably slower than the 67W charging on the Poco X5 Pro. Expect a full charge to take over 2 hours, which may be inconvenient for users who need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ What kind of storage does the Poco X5 Pro use, and is it expandable?
The Poco X5 Pro typically utilizes UFS 2.2 storage, offering fast read and write speeds. It also includes a dedicated microSD card slot for expandable storage, allowing you to add up to 1TB of additional capacity.
❓ How does the Dimensity 6300 handle multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 778G?
The Snapdragon 778G’s more powerful CPU and potentially faster RAM configuration provide a smoother multitasking experience. While the Dimensity 6300 is capable, you may notice slight delays when switching between numerous apps or running resource-intensive applications simultaneously.
