The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T3 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro are two contenders vying for your attention. Both leverage MediaTek's Dimensity series, but target slightly different priorities – the T3 focuses on a balanced experience, while the X6 Pro aims for outright performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging and a brighter display, justifies the potential price premium. However, the vivo T3 remains a compelling option for those prioritizing a more streamlined experience and potentially longer-term software support.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 21 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic or silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 188 g (6.56 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, flicker | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Blue, Cystal Flake | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo T3
- Potentially more efficient chipset for longer battery life during light use.
- Likely a more streamlined software experience.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Significantly less powerful chipset for demanding tasks.
- Slower charging speed (44W vs 67W).
- Likely a less bright display.
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Much faster Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset for superior performance.
- 67W fast charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0.
- Brighter display (1148 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
- Longer battery life (11:46h active use).
- Potentially higher price.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be more resource-intensive.
- May run warmer under sustained load.
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we'd expect from the vivo T3, making the X6 Pro far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the T3’s panel specifications aren’t provided, the X6 Pro’s brightness level suggests a superior panel technology. The X6 Pro’s brightness also implies a more robust backlight system, potentially contributing to better contrast. We can assume both use AMOLED panels given the market segment, but the X6 Pro’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for both devices are limited. However, given the Poco X6 Pro’s positioning, it’s likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones likely include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, the X6 Pro may benefit from a larger sensor or more advanced image processing algorithms. The T3’s camera is likely competent for everyday use, but the X6 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. We can safely assume both will have a standard set of camera modes, but the X6 Pro’s processing power will allow for faster image capture and more complex computational photography features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a substantial upgrade over the vivo T3’s Dimensity 7200. The 8300 Ultra features a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core alongside three additional Cortex-A715 cores clocked at 3.20 GHz, compared to the T3’s 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 configuration. This translates to significantly faster CPU performance, particularly in multi-threaded tasks. The GPU within the 8300 Ultra is also considerably more powerful, offering a superior gaming experience. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the architectural improvements in the 8300 Ultra provide a clear performance advantage. The T3’s CPU configuration, while capable, is geared towards efficiency rather than peak performance.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the vivo T3’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the X6 Pro’s endurance suggests a well-optimized system. Crucially, the X6 Pro supports 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0, enabling a full charge in just 45 minutes. The vivo T3’s 44W charging is slower, requiring more time to replenish the battery. This faster charging speed is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T3 if you need a reliable daily driver with a focus on efficiency and a clean software experience. It’s ideal for users who prioritize battery life over raw power and prefer a less aggressive, more refined aesthetic. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, fast charging, and a brighter, more vibrant display. This phone is geared towards power users and mobile gamers who demand the most from their device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a powerful chip, its 4nm process and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions should prevent excessive overheating. However, sustained gaming at maximum settings will inevitably generate heat. Expect some throttling after prolonged use, but the X6 Pro is still likely to maintain higher frame rates than the vivo T3.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo T3 slow compared to the 67W on the Poco X6 Pro in real-world use?
Yes, the difference is substantial. 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro can fully charge the device in approximately 45 minutes, while the vivo T3’s 44W charging will take considerably longer. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Xiaomi’s MIUI and vivo’s Funtouch OS?
MIUI is known for its extensive customization options and feature set, but can also be more resource-intensive and include pre-installed bloatware. Funtouch OS, on the other hand, generally offers a cleaner, more streamlined experience with a focus on simplicity. The choice depends on your preference for customization versus ease of use.
❓ Will the Poco X6 Pro receive more software updates and security patches than the vivo T3?
Historically, Xiaomi has provided relatively consistent software updates for its Poco devices, though the long-term support commitment can vary. Vivo also provides updates, but their update cadence can be less predictable. It's advisable to check the manufacturers' official websites for specific update policies.
