vivo T3 Ultra vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and responsiveness, the vivo T3 Ultra is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 9200+ chipset. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ excels in battery life and charging speed, making it ideal for those who value all-day use and minimal downtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T3 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 12 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 19 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 56 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar Gray, Frost Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | V2426 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo T3 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 9200+)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to CPU core configuration
- Faster CPU clock speeds for demanding tasks
- Slower charging speed (80W vs 120W)
- Battery life potentially lower than Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Incredibly fast 120W charging (19 minutes to full)
- Excellent battery life (10:38h active use)
- Higher peak display brightness (1283 nits)
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 7200 Ultra)
- CPU core configuration less optimized for sustained performance
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a peak brightness of 1283 nits, a figure the T3 Ultra’s display specifications don’t currently match. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Redmi’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding the T3 Ultra’s panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) are currently unavailable, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s brightness suggests a focus on outdoor usability. Color accuracy and calibration data are needed for a complete assessment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo T3 Ultra, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely features a more versatile camera system, given Xiaomi’s history of emphasizing camera capabilities in the Note series. The Redmi’s image processing will likely focus on vibrant colors and strong dynamic range. The T3 Ultra’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor size and image processing algorithms, which are currently unknown. We can assume both phones will offer capable main sensors, but the Redmi’s established track record gives it an initial edge.
Performance
The vivo T3 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm). The 9200+ features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, compared to the 7200 Ultra’s Cortex-A715 cores at 2.8 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the higher clock speed, results in significantly faster CPU performance in demanding tasks. While both chips are built on a 4nm process for efficiency, the 9200+’s superior core configuration will deliver a smoother experience in gaming and multitasking. The T3 Ultra’s CPU configuration (1+3+4) also suggests better sustained performance than the Redmi’s (2+6).
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines in battery and charging. Its 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes, is significantly faster than the vivo T3 Ultra’s 80W charging (56 minutes). While the T3 Ultra’s battery capacity is unspecified, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ achieves an impressive 10:38h active use score, indicating excellent battery life. The faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T3 Ultra if you’re a demanding user who frequently games, edits videos, or runs resource-intensive applications and need the fastest possible processor. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prioritize battery life, value incredibly fast 120W charging, and prefer a phone that can easily last a full day on a single charge, even with heavy usage.