The vivo T3 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The T3 Ultra brings the latest MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ chipset to the table, while the Poco F5 Pro leverages the proven Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo T3 Ultra emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset offers comparable, and in some cases superior, performance to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, coupled with significantly faster 80W charging. While the Poco F5 Pro boasts a slightly longer endurance rating, the T3 Ultra’s charging speed and modern chipset give it the edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 12 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 19 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 56 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lunar Gray, Frost Green | Black, White |
| Models | V2426 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T3 Ultra
- Faster 80W wired charging
- More modern Dimensity 9200+ chipset
- Potentially better CPU performance
- No wireless charging
- Battery capacity not specified
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Excellent 99-hour endurance rating
- 30W wireless charging support
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Slower 67W wired charging
- Older chipset architecture
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro’s display reaches a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the T3 Ultra’s display specs are not provided, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable brightness level given its positioning. Both devices feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, which is sufficient for smooth scrolling and gaming, but lacks the power-saving benefits of adaptive refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will feature capable main sensors, likely around 50MP. The absence of any mention of advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software processing for image stabilization. The usefulness of a 2MP macro camera, often found in this price range, is questionable, offering limited image quality compared to the main sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo T3 Ultra’s MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, offering a theoretical performance advantage over the Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) with its Cortex-X2 core at 3.0 GHz. The Dimensity 9200+ also benefits from a newer architecture, potentially leading to improved efficiency. Both phones utilize 4nm fabrication, suggesting similar thermal characteristics, but the Dimensity’s architecture may allow for sustained performance under load. The T3 Ultra’s CPU configuration (1+3+4) is also more modern than the Poco’s (1+3+4), potentially improving multi-tasking.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The T3 Ultra’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 80W wired charging significantly outperforms the Poco’s 67W charging. The T3 Ultra can reach 100% charge in just 56 minutes, while the Poco F5 Pro takes longer. The Poco F5 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the T3 Ultra. However, the T3 Ultra’s faster wired charging mitigates the potential disadvantage of a smaller battery capacity, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T3 Ultra if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prefer a phone with a proven track record of stability and a slightly longer battery life, and are comfortable with a slower charging experience. Both phones are excellent for media consumption, but the T3 Ultra’s newer chipset offers a future-proofing advantage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9200+ in the vivo T3 Ultra overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9200+ is a 4nm chipset, known for its efficiency. While gaming will generate heat, the architecture is designed to manage thermals effectively. The T3 Ultra’s thermal management system will be crucial, but the chipset itself is less prone to overheating than older generations.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro compare to the 80W charging on the vivo T3 Ultra in real-world usage?
The 80W charging on the T3 Ultra is significantly faster, reaching 100% in 56 minutes versus the Poco F5 Pro’s longer charge time. This means less time tethered to a charger, especially beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support high refresh rate gaming, and what frame rates can be expected in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Poco F5 Pro’s 120Hz display supports high refresh rate gaming. While specific frame rates depend on game settings, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is capable of delivering smooth gameplay at 60fps or higher in PUBG Mobile, potentially reaching 90fps with optimized settings.
