vivo T3 Ultra vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the vivo T3 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9200+ offers a significant leap in processing power. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in battery endurance, providing over 10 hours of active use, making it ideal for those who need all-day power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T3 Ultra | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 12 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 19 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 56 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar Gray, Frost Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2426 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo T3 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 9200+)
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Potentially superior gaming performance
- Battery life likely shorter than Edge 40 Neo
- Display specifications unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright display (1073 nits)
- Balanced feature set
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 7030)
- Slower charging speed (68W)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a display capable of reaching 1073 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo T3 Ultra’s display specifications are not provided, Motorola’s measured brightness is a significant advantage. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely utilizes a high refresh rate (typical for the segment) contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, though the T3 Ultra may also offer a similar feature. Without knowing the T3 Ultra’s panel technology, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or PWM dimming rates, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear quantifiable benefit.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited information on the vivo T3 Ultra’s camera system. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera is likely to focus on delivering balanced photo and video quality. The absence of specific sensor details for the T3 Ultra makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Dimensity 9200+’s ISP capabilities suggest strong image processing potential. It’s reasonable to assume the T3 Ultra will prioritize computational photography to enhance image quality, while the Edge 40 Neo will likely offer a more natural look. We can expect the Edge 40 Neo to have a strong video recording capability, a common strength of Motorola devices.
Performance
The vivo T3 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) chipset represents a substantial performance advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 9200+ features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A715 cores at 3.0 GHz and four Cortex-A510 cores at 2.0 GHz, offering significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 4nm process node of the 9200+ also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to a smoother experience in demanding games and applications for the T3 Ultra.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use. While the vivo T3 Ultra’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours suggests excellent power efficiency. The T3 Ultra compensates with 80W wired charging, promising a full charge in just 56 minutes, a significant advantage over the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging (50% in 15 minutes). This means the T3 Ultra can quickly top up its battery, minimizing downtime, even if its overall battery life is shorter than the Edge 40 Neo.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T3 Ultra if you are a power user who frequently games, edits videos, or runs demanding applications and values the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a more streamlined software experience, and a balanced feature set without sacrificing essential performance for everyday tasks.