The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T3 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options for users seeking premium features without the flagship price tag. This comparison dissects their core components – from chipsets and displays to charging speeds and battery performance – to determine which device offers the most well-rounded experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging fully replenishes the battery in just 19 minutes, and the 1283 nits peak brightness provides excellent outdoor visibility. However, the vivo T3 Pro offers a strong contender with a newer chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 27 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 03 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75 x 7.5 or 8.0 mm | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g or 190 g (6.49 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 21 min
7.5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sandstone Orange, Emerald Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | V2404 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | ₹ 31,999 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo T3 Pro
- Modern Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially better multi-tasking due to CPU core configuration
- 50% charge in 21 minutes with 80W charging
- Slower charging compared to Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Display brightness specifications currently unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (100% in 19 minutes)
- High peak brightness of 1283 nits
- Excellent battery life (10:38h active use)
- Dimensity 7200 Ultra may be less efficient than Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
- Potentially higher power consumption due to brighter display
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a clear advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1283 nits. This is crucial for usability in direct sunlight, a scenario where the vivo T3 Pro’s display specifications are currently unknown. While both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s brighter panel will consume more power, potentially impacting battery life. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests a standard refresh rate, meaning less dynamic power saving compared to flagship models.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo T3 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a high-resolution main sensor (likely 200MP, based on the series), with optical image stabilization (OIS) being a key feature. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s image signal processor (ISP) is capable of handling complex image processing tasks. The absence of information regarding the T3 Pro’s sensor size and aperture makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance. It's reasonable to assume both phones will include standard ultra-wide and macro lenses, but the quality of these secondary sensors is often less critical.
Performance
Both phones employ 4nm chipsets, but differ in their silicon. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, featuring a dual-core Cortex-A715 configuration clocked at 2.8 GHz. The vivo T3 Pro, on the other hand, is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, with a single Cortex-A715 core at 2.63 GHz, alongside three additional A715 cores. The Redmi’s higher clock speeds suggest a potential edge in raw processing power, but the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s architecture may offer better efficiency. The T3 Pro’s CPU configuration, with more A715 cores, could translate to improved multi-tasking performance. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but specific speeds are not provided.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines in the battery and charging department. Its 120W wired charging, utilizing PD3.0, can fully charge the device in a remarkable 19 minutes. The vivo T3 Pro’s 80W charging is respectable, reaching 50% in 21 minutes, but lags behind in overall speed. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also demonstrates impressive battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 10:38h. While the T3 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T3 Pro if you prioritize a modern chipset architecture and potentially better long-term software support, and are comfortable with slightly slower charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you value blazing-fast 120W charging, a significantly brighter display for outdoor use, and a proven track record of battery endurance, as evidenced by its 10:38h active use score.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the vivo T3 Pro exhibit thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the 4nm process should aid in thermal efficiency, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3's sustained performance under heavy load remains to be seen in independent testing. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s Dimensity 7200 Ultra also benefits from a 4nm process, but its thermal performance will depend on Xiaomi's cooling solution implementation.
❓ Is the 120W charging on the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely to degrade the battery health significantly over time?
Xiaomi employs charging algorithms designed to mitigate battery degradation from fast charging. However, all batteries degrade over time with use, and faster charging *can* contribute to this process. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s charging system includes safeguards, but long-term battery health will inevitably be affected.
❓ How does the CPU core configuration of the vivo T3 Pro (1x A715 + 3x A715 + 4x A510) impact real-world performance compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s (2x A715 + 6x A510)?
The T3 Pro's configuration suggests a focus on sustained performance with more mid-tier cores. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s dual high-performance cores may offer a burst of speed for demanding tasks, but the T3 Pro could maintain smoother performance during prolonged multi-tasking or gaming.
