The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T3 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options for users seeking flagship-like features without the flagship price tag. This comparison dissects their core components – from chipsets and displays to battery life and charging speeds – to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and display brightness, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset consistently outperforms the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in benchmarks, and the 1148 nits peak brightness provides a superior viewing experience. However, the vivo T3 Pro’s 80W charging offers a faster top-up.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 27 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 03 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75 x 7.5 or 8.0 mm | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g or 190 g (6.49 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 21 min
7.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sandstone Orange, Emerald Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | V2404 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | ₹ 31,999 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo T3 Pro
- 80W fast charging for rapid power-ups
- Potential for optimized software experience (vivo's Funtouch OS)
- Likely competitive pricing within the mid-range segment
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset is less powerful than Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Display specifications are currently unknown, potentially lacking brightness
- Limited information on camera sensor size and capabilities
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Dimensity 8300 Ultra delivers superior performance
- 1148 nits peak brightness for excellent outdoor visibility
- Longer active use battery life (11:46h)
- 67W charging is slower than the vivo T3 Pro’s 80W
- Xiaomi’s MIUI can be resource-intensive
- Potential for bloatware
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro boasts a significant advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1148 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a scenario where the vivo T3 Pro’s display specifications are currently unknown. While both devices utilize a 4nm process for their respective chipsets, the display’s impact on overall power consumption shouldn’t be underestimated; a brighter display generally requires more power. We anticipate the Poco X6 Pro’s panel will offer a more vibrant and usable experience in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information for the vivo T3 Pro. However, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro’s camera system likely features a more robust primary sensor, given its positioning as a performance-focused device. While both phones likely include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, the Poco X6 Pro’s image processing capabilities, coupled with potential OIS (Optical Image Stabilization), will likely result in sharper, more detailed photos and smoother video recording. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic and offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, with its 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core and higher clock speeds on its A715 performance cores (3x3.20 GHz vs 3x2.4 GHz on the vivo), demonstrably outperforms the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (2.63 GHz Cortex-A715). Both are built on a 4nm process, ensuring efficiency, but the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s architectural advantages translate to faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking. The Poco X6 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM further contributes to its performance edge, enabling quicker data access compared to the likely LPDDR4x or LPDDR5 found in the T3 Pro (spec not provided).
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro showcases a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11 hours and 46 minutes. While the vivo T3 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging significantly outpaces the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W charging. The T3 Pro can reach 50% charge in just 21 minutes, while the Poco X6 Pro requires 45 minutes for a full charge. This difference is crucial for users who prioritize quick top-ups, even if the overall battery life is slightly shorter. The Poco X6 Pro also supports QC2.0 and PD3.0 charging protocols, offering wider compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T3 Pro if you need exceptionally fast charging and value a brand known for consistent software updates. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and appreciate a streamlined user experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and longer active use battery life. This phone caters to power users and multimedia enthusiasts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which inherently improves thermal efficiency. While demanding games will inevitably generate heat, the chipset’s architecture and the Poco X6 Pro’s likely cooling system should prevent significant throttling, maintaining consistent performance for extended periods. However, sustained peak performance will still lead to some temperature increase.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the vivo T3 Pro compare to other 67W or 65W charging solutions in terms of real-world speed?
While the difference between 67W and 80W might seem small, it translates to a noticeable reduction in charging time, particularly in the initial stages. The vivo T3 Pro’s 80W charging can reach 50% in 21 minutes, which is faster than most 67W implementations. The faster charging speed is beneficial for users who need a quick power boost before heading out.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds between the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and Dimensity 8300 Ultra noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference in CPU clock speeds is unlikely to be noticeable. However, when performing demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s higher clock speeds and architectural advantages will result in a smoother and more responsive experience.
