The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options. The T3 Pro arrives with a focus on raw processing power thanks to the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Galaxy A55 emphasizes all-day battery life and Samsung’s established software ecosystem. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the vivo T3 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage. However, the Samsung Galaxy A55 excels in battery endurance and provides a more refined software experience, making it ideal for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 27 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 03 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75 x 7.5 or 8.0 mm | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 184 g or 190 g (6.49 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 21 min
7.5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sandstone Orange, Emerald Green | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | V2404 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | ₹ 31,999 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
vivo T3 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor
- 80W fast charging (50% in 21 mins)
- 7.5W reverse wired charging
- Battery life likely shorter than A55
- Camera specs currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Excellent 13:27h battery life
- Bright 1010 nit display
- Samsung’s One UI software
- Slower 25W charging
- Older Exynos 1480 chipset
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1010 nits, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the vivo T3 Pro’s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s panel technology is known for its color accuracy and viewing angles. The A55’s brightness advantage is significant for users who frequently consume content in direct sunlight. The lack of LTPO on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, rather than dynamically scaling down to 1Hz for static content.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo T3 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Galaxy A55’s camera system is likely to focus on Samsung’s image processing strengths, prioritizing vibrant colors and detail. The A55’s main sensor size and aperture are crucial factors, but without that data, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the T3 Pro. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and night mode, but the Snapdragon’s ISP capabilities could offer advantages in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo T3 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a tri-cluster configuration with Cortex-A715 cores, promising strong multi-core performance. The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) employs older Cortex-A78 cores. While the A55’s cores have a higher clock speed (2.75 GHz vs 2.63 GHz on the T3 Pro’s prime core), the newer architecture of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 generally translates to better efficiency and sustained performance. The T3 Pro is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon’s integrated GPU will also provide a more substantial graphical uplift.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 shines in battery life, achieving an active use score of 13 hours and 27 minutes. The vivo T3 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 80W wired, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 21 minutes. The A55’s 25W charging is comparatively slow. While the A55’s larger battery capacity provides longer runtimes, the T3 Pro’s rapid charging minimizes downtime. The T3 Pro also offers 7.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A55.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T3 Pro if you need a phone capable of handling demanding mobile games and applications, and value faster charging speeds. You’ll benefit from the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s superior CPU and GPU performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prioritize all-day battery life, a bright and vibrant display, and Samsung’s One UI software experience. It’s the better choice for users who primarily browse, stream, and capture casual photos.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480 is known to throttle under sustained load, particularly in graphically intensive games. While it's not a severe overheating issue, users may experience frame rate drops after extended play. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the T3 Pro, with its more efficient architecture, is less prone to throttling.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Galaxy A55 actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on smartphones offer limited detail and image quality. They often struggle with sharpness and dynamic range. While they can be fun for experimentation, don't expect professional-level macro photography from the A55's 2MP sensor. The T3 Pro's camera system, once specifications are available, will need to be assessed for its macro capabilities.
❓ Can the vivo T3 Pro reliably run PUBG Mobile at 90fps?
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset is capable of delivering a smooth 90fps experience in PUBG Mobile, but it will depend on the game settings and the phone's thermal management. Expect to potentially lower graphics settings to maintain a stable 90fps during extended matches. The A55's Exynos 1480 will likely struggle to consistently achieve 90fps.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the vivo T3 Pro compare to using a power bank?
80W wired charging is significantly faster than charging via a power bank. A power bank typically delivers 5-15W of power. The T3 Pro can gain a substantial charge in a short amount of time, whereas a power bank will take hours to fully replenish the battery. The T3 Pro's 80W charging is ideal for quickly topping up the battery when you have access to a wall outlet.
