vivo T3 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly faster 125W charging and superior battery life (11:59h active use) outweigh the vivo T3 Pro’s slightly lower price point, offering a more convenient and reliable daily experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T3 Pro | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 27 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 03 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75 x 7.5 or 8.0 mm | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g or 190 g (6.49 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 21 min 7.5W reverse wired | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sandstone Orange, Emerald Green | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | V2404 | XT2403-2 |
| Price | ₹ 31,999 | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
vivo T3 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 efficiency
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower 80W charging
- Unspecified battery life
- Lower display brightness (likely)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- 125W ultra-fast charging
- Excellent 11:59h battery life
- Brighter 1295 nit display
- Potentially higher price
- CPU core count slightly lower
- Wireless charging may generate more heat
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1295 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo T3 Pro. This higher peak brightness translates to better outdoor visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Edge 50 Pro’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for users who frequently consume content outdoors. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO) are missing for both, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone is targeting the high-end camera market. Focusing on the processor's ISP capabilities, both will likely offer decent image processing, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s potential for higher dynamic range due to its brighter display could indirectly benefit camera performance in challenging lighting conditions. The lack of information on OIS is a significant omission.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with a 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s CPU configuration includes 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, while the vivo T3 Pro has 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, potentially offering a slight edge in multi-threaded tasks. Both share 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. Thermal management, crucial for sustained performance, remains an unknown factor without testing, but the 4nm process node should provide reasonable efficiency. RAM specifications are not provided, but LPDDR5x is expected in this segment.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shines in battery performance, achieving 11:59h of active use. The vivo T3 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 80W wired charging is significantly slower than the Edge 50 Pro’s 125W charging, which promises a full charge in just 18 minutes. The Edge 50 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the vivo T3 Pro, which only provides 7.5W reverse wired charging. This charging speed disparity is a major advantage for the Motorola device.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T3 Pro if you need a capable all-rounder at the lowest possible price and aren't heavily reliant on fast charging or extended battery life. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prioritize rapid replenishment with 125W charging, longer battery endurance, and a brighter, more visible display, even if it means a slightly higher investment.