The vivo T2x and Realme 11 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both leverage MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, they diverge significantly in charging speed and overall feature set. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Realme 11 Pro+ is the clear winner. However, the vivo T2x offers a strong performance profile with its Dimensity 1300, making it a viable choice for those less concerned with charging speed and display brightness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.8 g (7.16 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 650 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS 2.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 100W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | - | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
vivo T2x
- Potentially stronger multi-core CPU performance
- Competitive price point
- Efficient 6nm Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Slower 44W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Realme 11 Pro+
- Camera details are unknown
Realme 11 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Brighter 793 nit display
- Potentially more refined camera experience
- CPU core count slightly lower than vivo T2x
- May be more expensive than vivo T2x
- Dimensity 7050 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 793 nits. While the vivo T2x’s display specs are not provided, this brightness advantage benefits users consuming content outdoors or in brightly lit environments. The Realme’s higher peak brightness also suggests a potentially wider color gamut and improved HDR performance. Without knowing the panel technology of the T2x, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy, but the Pro+’s brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ is positioned as a camera-focused device, though specific sensor details are lacking. The absence of detailed camera specs for the T2x makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Realme’s marketing emphasizes its camera capabilities, suggesting a more refined image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes. Without knowing the aperture and sensor size of the T2x’s main camera, it’s hard to assess low-light performance. The Realme’s focus on camera features suggests a more comprehensive photography experience, while the T2x likely prioritizes overall value.
Performance
Both phones utilize 6nm MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, but the vivo T2x’s Dimensity 1300 has a more complex CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – compared to the Realme 11 Pro+'s Dimensity 7050 with its 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This suggests the T2x *could* offer slightly better multi-core performance, particularly in heavily threaded tasks. However, the Dimensity 7050 benefits from architectural improvements, potentially offsetting the core count difference. The T2x’s performance will be more noticeable in demanding applications, while the 7050 will likely provide a smoother experience in everyday use. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR5x support in either device would further enhance performance.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing charging times compared to the vivo T2x’s 44W charging. While the Realme 11 Pro+ has an endurance rating of 112 hours, this is a lab test and doesn't reflect real-world usage. The 100W charging will allow users to top up their battery incredibly quickly, minimizing downtime. The T2x’s 44W charging is still respectable, but will take considerably longer to reach a full charge. The actual battery capacity of both devices is unknown, but the charging speed difference is the dominant factor here.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T2x if you need a balanced performer with a capable processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and aren't reliant on ultra-fast charging. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you prioritize minimizing downtime with its 100W charging, enjoy content on a brighter screen, and appreciate a more feature-rich camera experience, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7050 in the Realme 11 Pro+ get hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7050 is a capable chipset, sustained gaming can lead to thermal throttling. The Realme 11 Pro+ likely incorporates cooling solutions, but performance may decrease over long periods. The T2x's Dimensity 1300 may exhibit similar behavior, but the different CPU configuration could affect the throttling profile.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Realme 11 Pro+ with the 100W charger?
Realme claims the 100W SuperVOOC charging can take the Realme 11 Pro+ from 0-100% in around 25 minutes, but this is under ideal conditions. Expect slightly longer times in real-world scenarios, but still significantly faster than the vivo T2x’s 44W charging.
❓ Is the camera on the Realme 11 Pro+ good for low-light photography?
Without detailed sensor specifications, it's difficult to definitively say. However, the Realme 11 Pro+’s camera focus suggests a larger sensor and improved image processing for better low-light performance compared to a typical mid-range phone. Expect decent results, but don't expect flagship-level quality.
