Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming, especially with so many options in the budget-friendly range. Today, we're pitting the vivo T2x (India) against the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro to see which device offers the best overall experience. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 Pro emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 778G chipset, blazing-fast 67W charging, and brighter display. While the vivo T2x offers decent value, the Poco X5 Pro provides a more premium and powerful experience for a slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 11 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 21 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 0.64µm, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glimmer Black, Aurora Gold, Marine Blue | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2253 | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T2x (India)
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Sufficient for basic tasks
- Slower processor
- Less bright display
- Slow charging
- Less capable camera
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Fast Snapdragon 778G processor
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Versatile camera system
- Excellent battery life
- Slightly higher price
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its 912 nits max brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its contrast ratio is also superior. The vivo T2x's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the Poco X5 Pro. The Poco X5 Pro's AMOLED panel also provides richer colors and deeper blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Poco X5 Pro generally delivers better image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Poco X5 Pro's image processing tends to be more refined, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos. Video recording capabilities are also superior on the Poco X5 Pro.
Performance
The Poco X5 Pro's Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is considerably more powerful than the vivo T2x's Dimensity 6020. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Poco X5 Pro handles demanding games with ease, while the vivo T2x may struggle with more graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 113h. However, the Poco X5 Pro's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 45 minutes. The vivo T2x's 18W charging is significantly slower.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo T2x (India)? Users prioritizing a budget-friendly option and basic performance for everyday tasks. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro? Those seeking a faster processor, superior charging speeds, a brighter display, and a more versatile camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo T2x good for gaming?
The vivo T2x can handle basic games, but it may struggle with more demanding titles due to its less powerful processor. The Poco X5 Pro is a much better choice for gamers.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Poco X5 Pro charges from 0% to 100% in approximately 45 minutes with its 67W charger. The vivo T2x takes significantly longer with its 18W charging.
