The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T2 and Samsung Galaxy A14 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an accessible price point, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into every aspect, from display quality to battery life, to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo T2 takes the lead with its significantly faster charging and potentially smoother gaming experience thanks to the Helio G99. However, the Galaxy A14 5G boasts Samsung's reliable software, a potentially better display, and exceptional battery life, making it a strong all-rounder for everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 23 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 23 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 15W wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Onyx, Sea Green, Lavender Glow | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | V2199GA | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 307886 (v9)
GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T2
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Potentially Better Gaming Performance
- 6nm Process
- Likely Inferior Display Quality
- Uncertain Camera Performance
- Shorter Battery Life
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Exceptional Battery Life (130h Endurance)
- Samsung's Brand Reputation & Software
- Potentially Better Display Quality
- 5G Connectivity
- Slow Charging (15W)
- Potentially Weaker Gaming Performance
- Exynos/Dimensity Chipset Performance
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G's display, while having a similar contrast ratio, likely offers better color accuracy and viewing angles due to Samsung's display technology. The vivo T2's display is expected to be decent but may not match the A14 5G's overall quality. Brightness is also a factor, with the A14 5G measured at 519 nits, suggesting a potentially better outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively assess without detailed testing. However, Samsung's image processing is generally well-regarded. The Galaxy A14 5G likely offers more consistent results in various lighting conditions. The vivo T2's camera is expected to be capable, but may not match the A14 5G's overall image quality and software features.
Performance
The vivo T2's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a 6nm process, generally offers better gaming performance than the Exynos 1330 (5nm) or Dimensity 700 (7nm) found in the Galaxy A14 5G variants. While the Exynos 1330 is efficient, the G99's GPU provides a noticeable edge in graphically intensive tasks. The CPU performance is relatively close, but the G99's architecture gives it a slight advantage.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours. The vivo T2, while having a decent battery, doesn't match this longevity. However, the vivo T2's 66W charging significantly reduces charging time, offsetting the battery life difference to some extent.
Buying Guide
The vivo T2 is ideal for gamers and users who prioritize fast charging and a responsive experience. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is a better choice for those seeking long battery life, a trusted brand, and a more balanced overall package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo T2 generally offers better gaming performance due to its more powerful GPU.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G has significantly better battery life, lasting much longer on a single charge.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G worth the extra cost?
It depends. If battery life and brand reputation are important, then yes. If you prioritize gaming and fast charging, the vivo T2 might be a better value.
