The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus and vivo T2 represent compelling options. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus arrives as a refined iteration of Nothing’s design language with a focus on performance, while the vivo T2 prioritizes rapid charging and a streamlined user experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset and brighter display offer a smoother, more responsive experience. While the vivo T2’s 66W charging is faster, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s longer 16:34h active use battery life mitigates this advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 23 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 23 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Onyx, Sea Green, Lavender Glow | Black, Grey |
| Models | V2199GA | A142P |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
vivo T2
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7350 Pro)
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1097 nits)
- Longer battery life (16:34h active use)
- Slightly slower charging speed (50W)
- Potentially higher price point
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Faster charging (66W, 50% in 19 min)
- Potentially lower price
- Efficient Helio G99 chipset for basic tasks
- Less powerful processor for gaming and demanding apps
- Likely dimmer display
- Shorter battery life
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1097 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the vivo T2, making the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus far more usable in direct sunlight. While the vivo T2’s panel specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be a standard LCD or lower-tier AMOLED, lacking the high peak brightness and potentially the color accuracy of the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s superior brightness translates to a more immersive viewing experience for videos and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo T2, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus likely features a more sophisticated camera system. The focus should be on the main sensor size and image processing capabilities. While both phones likely include standard features like HDR and night mode, the Dimensity 7350 Pro’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, potentially leading to better image quality and faster processing times on the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus. We can assume both phones will have a standard set of lenses, but the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is likely to offer more refined image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro, built on a more efficient 4nm process, featuring a more modern CPU architecture with 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. This contrasts with the vivo T2’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) and its older Cortex-A76 and A55 cores. The Dimensity 7350 Pro’s architectural improvements and smaller node size result in significantly better CPU and GPU performance, making the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus the clear winner for gaming and demanding applications. The G99 is a capable chip for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus demonstrates superior battery endurance with a reported 16:34h of active use. While the vivo T2’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s longer runtime suggests a combination of a more efficient chipset and optimized software. The vivo T2 compensates with 66W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 19 minutes, while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus takes 21 minutes for the same. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus reaches 100% in 56 minutes, and its longer battery life means you won’t need to top it up as frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T2 if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are on a tighter budget. Its 66W charging will get you back up and running quickly. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you value a smoother, more capable processor for demanding apps and games, a brighter and more vibrant display, and longer overall battery life, even if it means slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7350 Pro in the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7350 Pro is built on a 4nm process, which generally results in better thermal efficiency compared to the 6nm Helio G99 in the vivo T2. While some heat is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is expected to manage temperatures more effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance for longer periods.
❓ How much does the faster charging of the vivo T2 matter in real-world use?
While the vivo T2’s 66W charging is faster initially, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s longer battery life reduces the need for frequent top-ups. The 2-minute difference to reach 50% is unlikely to be a significant inconvenience for most users, especially considering the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus still charges fully in under an hour.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Helio G99 and Dimensity 7350 Pro noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference may not be immediately apparent. However, the Dimensity 7350 Pro’s superior processing power will result in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience, even during everyday use.
