vivo T2 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a vibrant display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the measured 10:28h active use score significantly surpasses what the vivo T2 is likely to achieve. However, the vivo T2 remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T2 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 23 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 23 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black Onyx, Sea Green, Lavender Glow | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2199GA | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo T2
- More affordable price point
- Respectable 66W fast charging
- Capable Helio G99 processor for everyday tasks
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Edge 40 Neo
- Less powerful processor for demanding games and apps
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Higher price tag
- Charging speed is only marginally faster than the vivo T2
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the vivo T2, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Motorola’s display tuning) provide a superior viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as efficient as on flagship models, but both will likely offer a smooth 120Hz experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited information on the vivo T2’s camera system. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While sensor size and aperture details are missing for both, Motorola’s image processing algorithms are generally well-regarded. The Edge 40 Neo’s video capabilities are also likely to be more advanced, potentially offering features like 4K recording at higher frame rates. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Edge 40 Neo, if confirmed, would further enhance image and video stability.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset represents a clear upgrade over the vivo T2’s Helio G99. The Dimensity 7030 features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz versus the T2’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz – resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. While both chips are fabricated on a 6nm process, the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 7030 translate to a smoother experience with demanding apps and games. The Edge 40 Neo is likely to exhibit less throttling under sustained load. The T2 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Edge 40 Neo offers a more future-proofed experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s standout feature is its impressive battery life, achieving a remarkable 10:28h in active use testing. This significantly outperforms the vivo T2, which lacks comparable data. While the T2 offers 66W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in 19 minutes, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging is slightly faster, hitting 50% in 15 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours suggests excellent standby time. The combination of efficient chipset and optimized software contributes to the Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T2 if you need a reliable performer for everyday tasks and light gaming, and are prioritizing a lower price point. Its 66W charging is respectable, and the Helio G99 is a capable chip for the cost. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a brighter, more immersive display, longer battery life, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming. The faster charging and overall refinement make it a worthwhile investment for those willing to spend a bit more.