Google Pixel 7a vs. vivo T2: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. Its Tensor G2 chip and exceptional image processing deliver a superior photographic experience. However, the vivo T2’s 66W charging is a significant advantage for those who value speed and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T2 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 23 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 23 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black Onyx, Sea Green, Lavender Glow | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | V2199GA | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
vivo T2
- Superior camera performance thanks to Tensor G2 and Google’s image processing.
- Faster and more efficient processor for demanding tasks.
- Guaranteed software updates and a clean Android experience.
- Slower charging speeds (18W) compared to the vivo T2.
- Potentially higher price point.
Google Pixel 7a
- Extremely fast 66W wired charging.
- Potentially more affordable price.
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks.
- Less powerful processor compared to the Tensor G2.
- Inferior camera performance, especially in low light.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo T2’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower, impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel, combined with Google’s image processing, delivers vibrant and accurate colors. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving, but the Pixel 7a’s higher brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image clarity. The vivo T2’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s image processing capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, leveraging the Tensor G2’s processing power.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) features a tri-cluster configuration with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, designed for AI and machine learning tasks. This contrasts with the vivo T2’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Tensor G2’s more advanced architecture and smaller node size translate to superior performance in demanding applications and improved power efficiency. While the G99 is capable for everyday tasks, the Tensor G2 provides a smoother experience for gaming and content creation. The Pixel 7a also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds (likely LPDDR5x) compared to the T2.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting good battery life despite not having a massive capacity. The vivo T2 compensates for a potentially smaller battery with its 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging, while supporting PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, is significantly slower. This makes the vivo T2 the clear winner for users who prioritize quick top-ups, even if the overall battery endurance is comparable.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T2 if you need exceptionally fast charging and prioritize a smooth, responsive experience for everyday tasks. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a best-in-class camera, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and don’t mind slower charging speeds. It’s the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those invested in the Google ecosystem.