vivo T2 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the vivo T2 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7200, built on a 4nm process, offers a slight edge in efficiency and processing power. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo counters with excellent battery endurance and a brighter display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T2 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 22 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 22 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moon Black, Dune Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo T2 Pro
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7200 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Faster CPU clock speeds on prime cores
- Battery life data unavailable, potentially lower than Edge 40 Neo
- Slower charging time (50% in 22 minutes)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Faster charging (50% in 15 minutes)
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Older Cortex-A78 CPU cores
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor visibility. While the vivo T2 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from its focus on multimedia, while the T2 Pro may prioritize power efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration, a detail not provided in the source data.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but the specifics are unknown. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the presence of a 'Photo / Video' designation for the Edge 40 Neo suggests a focus on versatile camera capabilities. The T2 Pro’s camera performance will depend heavily on its image processing algorithms and sensor quality, which are not specified. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and night mode, but the quality of these features will vary.
Performance
The vivo T2 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4nm) and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm) represent different approaches to performance. The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 7200 generally translates to better thermal efficiency and power savings compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030. While the Edge 40 Neo’s CPU features slightly higher clock speeds on its Cortex-A78 cores (2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz on the T2 Pro’s A715), the architectural improvements and process node advantage of the T2 Pro likely result in superior sustained performance. The T2 Pro’s CPU configuration (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 Cortex-A510) is optimized for a balance of peak performance and efficiency, while the Edge 40 Neo (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) relies on older Cortex-A78 cores.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an 80-hour endurance rating. While the vivo T2 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s performance sets a high bar. Both phones support fast charging – 68W for the Edge 40 Neo and 66W for the T2 Pro. The Edge 40 Neo claims 50% charge in 15 minutes, while the T2 Pro takes 22 minutes. This suggests a slightly faster charging curve for the Edge 40 Neo, despite the minimal wattage difference. The Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery life, combined with competitive charging speeds, makes it a strong contender for users prioritizing longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T2 Pro if you need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming and video editing with minimal throttling, and if rapid charging is a priority. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a sleek, lightweight design. The Edge 40 Neo is ideal for users who value endurance over raw power.