The vivo T series has quickly become a popular choice for budget-conscious smartphone users in India. The vivo T2 and T2x offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one is the better buy? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo T2x generally edges out the T2 thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset, offering noticeably better performance for gaming and demanding tasks. While the T2 boasts slightly faster charging, the T2x's superior processing power makes it the winner for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 11 | 2022, May 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 18 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 202.8 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 650 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 12, OriginOS 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 25 min | 44W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nitro Blaze, Velocity Wave | Black, Blue |
| Models | V2240, V2222 | - |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 220 EUR |
vivo T2 (India)
- Slightly faster charging
- Potentially more refined Funtouch OS
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset than T2x
- May struggle with demanding games
- Camera performance potentially slightly behind T2x
vivo T2x
- More powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Better gaming performance
- Smoother overall experience
- Likely slightly better camera processing
- Charging speed identical to T2
- Funtouch OS experience can be polarizing
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.72-inch FHD+ IPS LCD displays with a 120Hz refresh rate. Expect vibrant colors and smooth scrolling, but don't anticipate OLED-level contrast or brightness. The T2x might have slightly better color accuracy based on the Dimensity 1300's GPU capabilities, but this is marginal.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, both phones likely feature a 50MP main camera. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. The T2x's more powerful processor *could* allow for better image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in slightly improved photos, especially in low light. Expect similar ultrawide and macro lenses on both.
Performance
This is where the T2x shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 1300 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 695. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the T2x. The T2's Snapdragon 695 is still capable for everyday tasks, but it will struggle more with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
Both phones feature a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. The T2 has a slight edge with 44W wired charging, promising a 50% charge in 25 minutes. The T2x also has 44W charging, so the difference is minimal.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo T2 (India)? Users prioritizing slightly faster charging and potentially a more refined software experience (vivo's Funtouch OS can vary). Who should buy the vivo T2x? Gamers, power users, and anyone seeking a smoother, more responsive experience with a stronger processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo T2x worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance and gaming, the T2x is definitely worth the extra investment. The Dimensity 1300 offers a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 695.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have a 5000mAh battery and offer all-day battery life. Charging speeds are comparable.
