vivo T1x vs. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and fast charging, the vivo T1x is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset offers a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 695 in the Galaxy A23 5G. However, the A23 5G provides a more refined software experience and a slightly longer endurance rating, making it a solid choice for casual users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T1x | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA 8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora, Silver | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | V2123A | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 138h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318821 (v9) GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1x
- Faster charging (44W vs 25W)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 900)
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- Less established brand reputation
- Potentially less refined software experience
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Established brand reputation (Samsung)
- Potentially better image processing
- Slightly brighter display
- Slower processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Slower charging (25W)
Display Comparison
Both the vivo T1x and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G feature displays with a 1328:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the A23 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 508 nits, providing better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels (given the price point), Samsung’s display calibration typically offers more accurate color reproduction. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is a common compromise in this segment, but the A23 5G’s higher brightness gives it a slight edge for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer a standard photo/video camera setup, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Given the price bracket, image quality will likely be similar in good lighting conditions. However, the A23 5G’s brand reputation suggests potentially more refined image processing algorithms, leading to more pleasing results for casual users. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A23 5G (if equipped, which is likely given Samsung’s history) would provide a significant advantage in low-light photography and video recording, reducing blur and improving stability. We can assume both phones include a 2MP macro camera, which offers limited practical utility.
Performance
The vivo T1x’s Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) in CPU performance. The Dimensity 900’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, provides a substantial boost over the Snapdragon 695’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. While both chipsets are 6nm, the Cortex-A78 architecture is inherently more powerful than the Kryo 660 Gold. The T1x is better suited for users who push their phones with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the vivo T1x and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G achieve an endurance rating of 138 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the T1x’s 44W wired charging is a significant advantage over the A23 5G’s 25W charging. The T1x can reach 70% charge in just 38 minutes, while the A23 5G will take considerably longer to fully charge. This faster charging speed is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1x if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value rapid 44W charging. This phone is ideal for users who frequently switch between apps and require a responsive experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you prefer a more established brand with a focus on battery longevity and a generally smoother, albeit less powerful, user experience. It’s a better fit for users who primarily browse, stream, and use social media.