The vivo T1x and Oppo K10x represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a balance of performance and features without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The T1x leverages MediaTek’s Dimensity 900, while the K10x opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 695 5G. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best fits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a slightly more refined software experience, the Oppo K10x emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and while the Snapdragon 695 isn't a performance king, it's efficient and capable for everyday tasks. However, the vivo T1x offers a strong CPU performance profile for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora, Silver | Blue, Black |
| Models | V2123A | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 210 EUR |
vivo T1x
- Stronger CPU performance for demanding tasks
- Competitive price point
- Efficient 6nm Dimensity 900 chipset
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Potentially less optimized software experience
Oppo K10x
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Qualcomm’s optimized 5G modem
- Generally smoother software experience with ColorOS
- Slightly weaker CPU performance compared to the T1x
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is on processing power, not visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be moderate, and color accuracy will likely be sufficient for everyday use, but not ideal for professional content creation.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The image processing algorithms will differ, with vivo typically favoring vibrant colors and Oppo leaning towards more natural tones. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is expected on both, meaning low-light performance will rely heavily on software processing. The quality of the main sensor will be the determining factor, but without knowing the sensor size or aperture, it’s impossible to declare a clear winner.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo T1x’s MediaTek Dimensity 900, built on a 6nm process, features a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This translates to potentially faster performance in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the Oppo K10x’s Snapdragon 695 5G (also 6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. However, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized 5G modem and generally better software support. The Dimensity 900’s CPU advantage may be more noticeable in applications that heavily rely on single-core performance, while the Snapdragon 695 offers a more balanced experience. RAM configurations are likely similar, impacting multitasking capabilities on both devices.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10x takes a clear lead in charging speed with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 33 minutes. The vivo T1x’s 44W charging, while respectable, takes 38 minutes to reach 70%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the K10x mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. This means less time tethered to a charger, a significant benefit for users on the move.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1x if you prioritize raw CPU performance for tasks like video editing or running demanding apps, and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask and need a responsive experience. Buy the Oppo K10x if you value fast charging above all else, and prefer a more streamlined user experience with Oppo’s ColorOS. This phone is perfect for users who are always on the go and need to quickly top up their battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset for mid-range gaming, but it won't deliver the highest frame rates at maximum settings. You'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth and consistent experience. The Dimensity 900 in the T1x might offer a slight edge in raw graphical performance, but both phones will require some compromise for optimal gaming.
❓ How does Oppo’s ColorOS compare to vivo’s Funtouch OS in terms of bloatware and user experience?
Historically, both Funtouch OS and ColorOS have been criticized for pre-installed bloatware, but both have improved significantly in recent years. ColorOS generally offers a cleaner and more refined user experience with more customization options. Funtouch OS has become less intrusive, but may still include more pre-installed apps. The choice depends on personal preference, but ColorOS is often favored for its smoother animations and more intuitive interface.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 44W and 67W really that noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is substantial. While both are considered fast charging, the 67W on the Oppo K10x can add a significant amount of battery life in a short period. Going from 0% to 80% in 33 minutes versus 70% in 38 minutes means less downtime and more time using your phone. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently forget to charge their phones overnight.
