vivo T1x vs. OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G is the better choice. While the vivo T1x boasts significantly faster 44W charging, the Snapdragon 695 offers a more balanced and thermally managed experience, leading to more consistent performance during demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T1x | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, April 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, April 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora, Silver | Black Dusk, Blue Tide |
| Models | V2123A | CPH2381, CPH2409 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
vivo T1x
- Significantly faster 44W charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance
- Competitive price point
- Dimensity 900 may throttle under sustained load
- Potentially less efficient than Snapdragon 695
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Qualcomm ISP potentially delivers better image quality
- Slower 33W charging
- CPU clock speeds are slightly lower than the T1x
Display Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature similar LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, detailed display specs (resolution, refresh rate, peak brightness) are missing. Given the market positioning, expect 60Hz panels. The real difference will likely be in color calibration and viewing angles, areas where OnePlus generally performs slightly better. Without specific data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner, but OnePlus's history suggests a more refined display experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with depth and macro lenses. The absence of OIS on either device suggests image stabilization will rely heavily on software processing. The Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally regarded as more advanced, potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Dimensity 900 is capable, but Qualcomm typically holds an edge in image processing algorithms. We expect similar front-facing camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo T1x utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm), featuring a Cortex-A78 based CPU configuration (2x2.4 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz). This suggests strong burst performance, ideal for short, intensive tasks. Conversely, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with a Kryo 660 Gold/Silver configuration (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz). While the clock speeds are slightly lower, the Snapdragon 695 is known for its efficiency and sustained performance. The Dimensity 900 may initially feel faster, but the Snapdragon 695 is likely to maintain performance for longer periods without significant throttling. This benefits gamers and multi-taskers.
Battery Life
The vivo T1x’s 44W charging is a significant advantage, promising a 70% charge in just 38 minutes. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s 33W charging is considerably slower. However, battery capacity is not specified for either device. Assuming similar capacities (around 5000mAh), the faster charging of the T1x will be more noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency may offset the slower charging, potentially resulting in comparable overall battery life despite the charging speed difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1x if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging and frequently find yourself needing to top up quickly. It’s ideal for users who prioritize convenience over sustained peak performance. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G if you value a more efficient processor, potentially better long-term performance due to thermal management, and a smoother overall experience, even if it means slightly slower charging.