The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo T1x and Motorola Moto G52 both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The T1x prioritizes processing power with a Mediatek Dimensity 900, while the Moto G52 focuses on efficiency with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the vivo T1x is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 900 chipset offers a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Moto G52 provides a more balanced experience with potentially better battery optimization, making it suitable for casual users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora, Silver | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | V2123A | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 470 EUR |
vivo T1x
- Faster 44W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- More powerful Dimensity 900 chipset for better performance.
- Potentially better image processing due to stronger CPU/GPU.
- May experience more heat under sustained load.
- Software experience may be less clean than Motorola's.
Motorola Moto G52
- Potentially better battery life due to Snapdragon 680's efficiency.
- Cleaner, near-stock Android experience.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Slower 30W charging.
- Less powerful Snapdragon 680 chipset for demanding tasks.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, both utilize 6nm chipsets suggesting a focus on efficiency, potentially extending screen-on time. The absence of high refresh rates on either device indicates a cost-saving measure. Bezels are likely comparable given the price point, and color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature a primary camera accompanied by depth or macro sensors. The T1x’s processing power may allow for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better low-light performance. The Snapdragon 680’s ISP is capable, but the Dimensity 900’s superior processing capabilities could give the T1x an advantage in dynamic range and detail. We can assume both phones will struggle with significant zoom capabilities.
Performance
The vivo T1x’s Mediatek Dimensity 900 is the performance champion here. Its octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, provides a significant uplift in CPU performance compared to the Motorola Moto G52’s Snapdragon 680. The Snapdragon 680, with its 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores, is still capable, but the Dimensity 900’s architecture is more modern and efficient for demanding applications. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the T1x. Both chips are built on a 6nm process, but the Dimensity 900’s core design gives it an edge.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G52’s 30W charging is slower than the vivo T1x’s 44W charging. The T1x can reach 70% charge in 38 minutes, offering a significant convenience factor. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 680’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size in the Moto G52, providing comparable all-day battery life. However, users who frequently engage in power-intensive activities will likely benefit from the T1x’s faster charging and potentially larger battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1x if you frequently play mobile games, edit photos/videos, or multitask heavily. The Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 cores and 44W charging will significantly improve your experience. Buy the Motorola Moto G52 if you prioritize all-day battery life, prefer a cleaner software experience, and primarily use your phone for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and calls. Its Snapdragon 680 is efficient and reliable for everyday use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 900 in the vivo T1x overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 900 is a powerful chip, its 6nm process helps mitigate heat. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The T1x’s thermal management system will likely throttle performance to prevent overheating, but the extent of throttling will depend on the game and ambient temperature. The Moto G52’s Snapdragon 680 will likely run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G52 support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Motorola generally includes VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) support on its devices, but compatibility depends on your carrier. It's crucial to check with your mobile provider to ensure they support these features on the Moto G52. The vivo T1x’s compatibility will also vary by region and carrier.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the vivo T1x and Moto G52?
Motorola is known for its near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware, offering a clean and user-friendly interface. vivo’s Funtouch OS, on the other hand, is heavily customized and includes a variety of pre-installed apps and features. Users who prefer a simpler, more streamlined experience will likely prefer the Moto G52, while those who enjoy customization options may appreciate Funtouch OS.
