The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the vivo T1x 4G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G. Both promise solid performance and features, but which one truly comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G edges out the vivo T1x 4G thanks to its faster chipset (Snapdragon 685 vs 680), faster charging (33W vs 18W), and potentially better display brightness. Both offer excellent battery life, making them strong contenders in the budget segment.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2023, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2023, March 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 183.5 g (6.49 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Space Blue | Onyx Gray, Mint Green, Ice Blue |
| Models | V2143 | 23021RAAEG, 23021RAA2Y, 23027RAD4I, 23028RA60L |
| Price | About 150 EUR | £ 189.99 / € 107.98 / ₹ 9,998 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.9 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 319219 (v9)
GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1), 1341 (v6)
GFXBench: 7.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1x 4G
- Sleek design
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Good battery life
- Slower charging (18W)
- Less powerful chipset than Redmi Note 12 4G
- Lower display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
- Faster charging (33W)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 685)
- Brighter display (744 nits)
- Design may be less appealing to some
- Potential for MIUI bloatware
- Camera performance not significantly better than T1x 4G
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 4G boasts a measured peak brightness of 744 nits, significantly higher than the T1x 4G, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the T1x 4G's display is adequate, the Redmi Note 12 4G's higher brightness provides a more enjoyable viewing experience. Both likely feature similar LCD panels with FHD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable between the two, with both offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. However, the Redmi Note 12 4G might have a slight edge in video recording due to potentially better image stabilization and processing. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Redmi Note 12 4G's Snapdragon 685 offers a noticeable performance advantage over the T1x 4G's Snapdragon 680. The Cortex-A73 cores in the 685 are more powerful than the Kryo 265 Gold cores in the 680, resulting in smoother app launches, multitasking, and potentially better gaming performance. Both phones will handle everyday tasks without issue.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with an endurance rating of 117 hours. This suggests excellent all-day battery performance for both devices. The Redmi Note 12 4G's faster 33W charging will allow it to recharge significantly quicker than the T1x 4G's 18W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1x 4G is a good choice for users prioritizing a sleek design and a reliable, albeit slightly less powerful, processor for everyday tasks. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G is ideal for those who want a brighter display, faster charging, and a slightly more powerful chipset for smoother multitasking and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G is generally better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 685 chipset.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Redmi Note 12 4G charges faster with 33W charging, likely taking around 1.5-2 hours. The vivo T1x 4G with 18W charging will take approximately 2.5-3 hours.
