The Oppo A76 and vivo T1x 4G occupy a fiercely competitive segment: the sub-$200 4G smartphone market. Both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680, promising a similar core experience. However, a key differentiator emerges in their charging capabilities, making the Oppo A76 a compelling option for users prioritizing rapid power-ups.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Oppo A76 is the better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 680 chipset, the A76’s significantly faster 33W charging dramatically improves usability, reducing downtime and making it ideal for those constantly on the go. The vivo T1x 4G remains a viable option, but the charging difference is substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, February 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Space Blue | Glowing Black, Glowing Blue |
| Models | V2143 | CPH2375 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 117.99 / £ 162.99 |
vivo T1x 4G
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 680 performance
- Likely good battery life (5000mAh expected)
- Slow 18W charging
- Basic display technology
- Limited camera capabilities
Oppo A76
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Reliable Snapdragon 680 performance
- Likely good battery life (5000mAh expected)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Basic display technology
- Limited camera capabilities
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor Oppo provide detailed display specifications beyond the basic panel type. Given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels with 60Hz refresh rates. The absence of higher refresh rates is typical for this segment. Bezels are expected to be moderate, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over an immersive edge-to-edge experience. Color accuracy will likely be standard for budget devices, leaning towards vibrant but not necessarily color-accurate profiles.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse, but both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses. The real-world image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Given the market segment, expect the primary sensor to be around 13-50MP. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely for marketing purposes, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing will likely prioritize vibrant colors and boosted contrast over natural accuracy.
Performance
Both the vivo T1x 4G and Oppo A76 are powered by the Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical between the two. The 6nm process node offers a good balance of power efficiency and performance. However, thermal management will be crucial; sustained workloads could lead to throttling, impacting gaming performance. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X is the likely standard, limiting memory bandwidth compared to newer standards like LPDDR5.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but both likely house batteries in the 5000mAh range, typical for this price point. The critical difference lies in the charging speed. The vivo T1x 4G supports 18W wired charging, while the Oppo A76 boasts 33W wired charging. This translates to a significantly faster 0-100% charge time for the Oppo A76 – potentially under an hour compared to over two hours for the vivo T1x 4G. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1x 4G if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid, dependable device for basic smartphone tasks. Buy the Oppo A76 if you value convenience and need to quickly replenish battery life, especially if you’re a heavy user who doesn’t have time to wait for hours to reach a full charge. The 33W charging is a significant advantage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo A76 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. Prolonged gaming sessions may lead to thermal throttling, reducing performance over time. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's adequate for casual gaming.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the vivo T1x 4G with the 18W charger?
Based on similar devices with 18W charging and a 5000mAh battery, a full 0-100% charge on the vivo T1x 4G will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. This is considerably slower than the Oppo A76's 33W charging.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited practical value. The low resolution results in images lacking detail. While they can be fun to experiment with, don't expect professional-quality macro photography.
❓ Does the Oppo A76 support reverse charging?
Neither Oppo nor Vivo officially advertise reverse charging support for these models. It's highly unlikely that either phone supports using its battery to charge other devices.
