The vivo T1x 4G and Motorola Moto G52 occupy a similar price bracket, both relying on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 680 chipset. This comparison isn’t about raw power – both phones deliver comparable performance – but rather about how each manufacturer optimizes the experience around this chipset, particularly focusing on charging speed and overall usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G52 emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 680 processor, the Moto G52’s 30W charging significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for those who frequently need to top up their battery throughout the day. The vivo T1x 4G remains a viable option, but the charging difference is a key differentiator.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Space Blue | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | V2143 | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 470 EUR |
vivo T1x 4G
- Potentially lower price point
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 provides efficient performance
- Reliable brand reputation
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely basic display technology
- Camera quality may be limited without detailed specs
Motorola Moto G52
- Faster 30W charging for quicker top-ups
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 offers good efficiency
- Motorola’s near-stock Android experience
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo T1x 4G
- Display specs are likely similar to the vivo T1x 4G
- Camera performance dependent on sensor quality
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor Motorola provided display specs beyond the chipset. Assuming both utilize LCD panels common in this price segment, the experience will be similar. Expect adequate brightness for indoor use, but potentially limited visibility in direct sunlight. The absence of high refresh rates (90Hz or 120Hz) is typical, focusing on power efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will hinge on sensor size and image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size. The primary sensor’s aperture and size will be the most critical factors determining image quality in various lighting conditions. Motorola’s image processing tends towards more natural colors, while vivo often boosts saturation.
Performance
Both the vivo T1x 4G and Motorola Moto G52 are powered by the Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical in day-to-day tasks and light gaming. The 6nm process node contributes to reasonable power efficiency. However, sustained performance will depend heavily on thermal management, a detail not specified in the provided data. RAM configuration (likely 4GB or 6GB) will have a more noticeable impact on multitasking than the CPU itself.
Battery Life
The core difference lies in charging speed. The vivo T1x 4G supports 18W wired charging, while the Motorola Moto G52 boasts 30W wired charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times for the Moto G52. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging is a more impactful feature than a slight difference in mAh. A 30W charger can realistically deliver a 0-50% charge in around 30 minutes, whereas the 18W charger will take considerably longer. This is a crucial advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1x 4G if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and charge overnight. Buy the Motorola Moto G52 if you value faster charging and appreciate the convenience of quickly replenishing your battery, even if it means spending a little more. This phone suits users who are often on the go and need a reliable, quickly-chargeable device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G52 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. Don’t expect a flagship-level gaming experience, but it’s perfectly adequate for casual gaming.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G52 with the 30W charger?
While a precise time depends on the battery capacity (not specified), a 30W charger should fully charge the Moto G52 in approximately 60-75 minutes, significantly faster than the vivo T1x 4G’s 18W charging.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G52 have a dedicated microSD card slot for expandable storage?
Motorola typically includes a dedicated microSD card slot in their G-series phones, and the Moto G52 is likely to follow suit. This allows you to expand the internal storage, which is particularly useful if you plan to store a lot of photos, videos, or games.
