The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo T1x 4G, powered by the Snapdragon 680, and the Infinix Note 12 (2023) with its Helio G99 chipset represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, battery, and charging to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a smoother experience, the Infinix Note 12 (2023) emerges as the winner. Its Helio G99 chipset, with its Cortex-A76 cores, offers a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 680, especially in demanding tasks, and the 33W charging is a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, October 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm (6.47 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, XOS 10.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Space Blue | Volcanic Grey, Tuscany Blue, Alpine White |
| Models | V2143 | X676C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 220 EUR |
vivo T1x 4G
- Proven Snapdragon 680 efficiency
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Potentially more refined software experience (depending on vivo's Funtouch OS)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful processor compared to Helio G99
- Likely limited gaming performance
Infinix Note 12 (2023)
- More powerful Helio G99 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- MediaTek chipsets sometimes have less consistent software support
- Potential for slightly higher power consumption
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here is on processing power, not pixel density. While specific display specs are missing, the real-world impact will be minimal for typical usage. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be standard for the segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price point, both phones likely feature a primary sensor around 13-50MP, accompanied by auxiliary lenses of limited utility (likely a 2MP macro and depth sensor). Image processing will be the key differentiator, and Infinix often leans towards more saturated, vibrant images, while vivo typically aims for more natural tones. The absence of OIS on either device suggests low-light performance will be similar, relying heavily on software algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 12 (2023)'s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a significant uplift in single-core and multi-core performance compared to the vivo T1x 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) which uses four Kryo 265 Gold cores at 2.4 GHz and four Kryo 265 Silver cores at 1.9 GHz. The G99’s Cortex-A76 cores are more powerful than the Snapdragon’s Kryo 265 Gold, resulting in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 6nm chips, the architectural advantage favors the Helio G99. The Snapdragon 680 prioritizes efficiency, while the G99 aims for a balance of power and efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones likely house batteries in the 5000mAh range, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. However, the Infinix Note 12 (2023) significantly pulls ahead with its 33W wired charging. This will translate to substantially faster charging times compared to the vivo T1x 4G’s 18W charging. Expect the Infinix to go from 0-100% in around 60-75 minutes, while the vivo T1x 4G will likely take over 2 hours. This difference is crucial for users who value minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1x 4G if you prioritize a proven, efficient chipset and a reliable, if slower, charging experience. It's a solid choice for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Infinix Note 12 (2023) if you prefer a more powerful processor for gaming and multitasking, and value faster charging speeds to minimize downtime. It's the better option for users who push their phones harder.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G99 in the Infinix Note 12 (2023) overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Helio G99 is a capable processor, sustained gaming can generate heat. However, the 6nm process node and Infinix's thermal management solutions should prevent significant throttling. Expect some performance reduction after extended play, but it shouldn't render the phone unusable. The Snapdragon 680 in the T1x will likely run cooler, but at the cost of overall performance.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo T1x 4G slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
For casual users, 18W charging is adequate, but it's noticeably slower than the 33W charging on the Infinix Note 12 (2023). Expect a full charge to take over two hours. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery, the slower charging speed could be a significant drawback.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 680 compare to the Helio G99 in terms of software updates and long-term support?
Qualcomm generally has a better track record for providing consistent software updates and security patches compared to MediaTek. However, this also depends on vivo's commitment to supporting the T1x 4G. While the Helio G99 is a newer chip, Infinix's update policy should also be considered.
