The sub-₹25,000 (approximately $300 USD) Indian smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo T1 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The vivo T1 prioritizes processing power with the Snapdragon 778G, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G focuses on rapid charging with its 67W system. This comparison dissects these key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance in demanding applications and gaming, the vivo T1 is the superior choice thanks to its Snapdragon 778G. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G wins for those who value incredibly fast charging and can tolerate a slight performance trade-off. The 67W charging is a significant advantage for power users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | - | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo T1
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G processor
- Superior CPU architecture for demanding tasks
- Potentially better sustained performance during gaming
- Slower 44W charging compared to the competition
- Likely less emphasis on camera hardware
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Potentially higher resolution main camera sensor
- Likely brighter display
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 processor
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature AMOLED panels (based on market segment), the provided data doesn't specify display characteristics. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's positioning suggests a potentially higher peak brightness and possibly a 120Hz refresh rate, common in its price bracket. The vivo T1, while still likely offering a vibrant display, may prioritize cost savings in this area. Without specific nit ratings or refresh rate data, a definitive winner is impossible to declare, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G likely has an edge.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications. However, given the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s marketing, it likely features a higher megapixel main sensor (potentially 108MP or 200MP) compared to the vivo T1. While megapixels aren't everything, a larger sensor generally captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role, and Xiaomi’s typically leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while vivo often aims for more natural tones. Without detailed sensor size and aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a camera winner, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G likely has a hardware advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo T1’s Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) utilizes a more powerful CPU architecture – specifically, Cortex-A78 cores – compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) which uses Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores. The 778G’s CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a significant advantage in multi-core performance and single-core responsiveness. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The 6nm process node is shared, but the architectural superiority of the 778G is undeniable. Users who frequently edit videos, play demanding games, or run multiple apps simultaneously will benefit significantly from the vivo T1.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is the clear winner here. Advertised figures claim 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The vivo T1’s 44W charging, while respectable, pales in comparison. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G significantly reduces downtime. Even if the vivo T1 has a slightly larger battery, the Redmi’s charging speed will likely result in more usable battery life throughout the day for power users. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 support on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G also adds to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 if you need a phone capable of handling graphically intensive games and multitasking without significant slowdown. It’s ideal for mobile gamers and power users. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer a phone that can quickly top up its battery, minimizing downtime and offering convenience for users constantly on the go. It’s best for those who prioritize battery life and charging speed over raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 778G in the vivo T1 will provide a smoother experience at higher settings, making it the better choice for serious mobile gamers.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 44W charging on the vivo T1 in real-world usage?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can gain a significant charge in a short amount of time. While the vivo T1's 44W is still fast, the Redmi can go from 0% to 50% in just 15 minutes, and fully charge in around 42 minutes. The vivo T1 will take considerably longer to reach 100%, making the Redmi ideal for users who frequently need a quick top-up.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the vivo T1 get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is generally efficient, but it can get warm during extended gaming. However, the vivo T1 likely incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating and prevent significant performance throttling. It's still less prone to throttling than the Snapdragon 695 under similar conditions.
