The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T1 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 are two popular contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you determine which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo T1 takes the lead with its significantly faster Snapdragon 778G chipset, offering a smoother overall experience. However, the Redmi Note 11 boasts exceptional battery life and a bright display. Ultimately, the T1 is for performance seekers, while the Note 11 prioritizes longevity and value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | - | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | About 300 EUR | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | - | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 778G)
- Faster Charging (44W)
- Potentially Better Camera Processing
- Sleek Design (typical of vivo)
- Battery Life Not as Exceptional as Redmi Note 11
- Display Brightness Lower than Redmi Note 11
- May lack some of Redmi Note 11's software features
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Exceptional Battery Life (126h Endurance Rating)
- Bright Display (736 nits)
- Excellent Value for Money
- Good Camera for Casual Use
- Slower Processor (Snapdragon 680)
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Performance Limitations with Demanding Apps/Games
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 shines with its measured 736 nits peak brightness, making it easily viewable outdoors. While the vivo T1's display is good, it lacks the same level of brightness. The Redmi Note 11's infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, though real-world performance can vary. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels, offering rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera specs are missing. The Redmi Note 11 likely focuses on producing pleasing, shareable photos, while the vivo T1 might offer slightly better dynamic range and detail thanks to its more powerful processor assisting image processing. Low-light performance is likely comparable.
Performance
This is where the vivo T1 truly excels. The Snapdragon 778G is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Redmi Note 11's Snapdragon 680. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the vivo T1. The Redmi Note 11 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11's endurance rating of 126 hours is incredibly impressive, suggesting exceptional battery life. The vivo T1's 44W charging is faster, reaching 70% in 38 minutes, but the Redmi Note 11's larger battery capacity likely compensates for the slower charging speed, resulting in longer overall usage.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, gaming, and a responsive user interface. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a great choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a budget-friendly price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo T1 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset.
❓ Which phone will last longer on a single charge?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 offers exceptional battery life, easily outperforming the vivo T1 in endurance tests.
❓ Is the vivo T1 worth the extra cost?
If performance is a priority, the vivo T1's faster processor justifies the higher price. If you prioritize battery life and value, the Redmi Note 11 is the better choice.
