vivo T1 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and responsiveness, the vivo T1 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset offers a significant advantage in CPU and GPU tasks. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging and comparable battery endurance make it a strong alternative for those who value convenience and all-day battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T1 | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 778G
- Faster CPU and GPU performance for gaming and multitasking
- More responsive user experience
- Slower charging speed (44W vs 67W)
- Potentially less battery optimization compared to Poco
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Comparable battery endurance (119h)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Lower CPU and GPU performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels, a common feature in this price bracket. However, specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The focus here is likely on providing vibrant visuals rather than display accuracy. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar overall design philosophies of both brands. Without further data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the vivo T1 might prioritize image processing for sharper details, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G could lean towards more saturated colors. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value. A deeper analysis would require sample images and detailed camera specs.
Performance
The vivo T1’s Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core CPU, featuring a 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, significantly outperforms the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6 nm). The 778G’s CPU architecture, with its more powerful Cortex-A78 cores, translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The GPU within the 778G also provides a substantial gaming advantage. While both chipsets are 6nm, the 778G is built for higher sustained performance. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, are adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts a 67W wired charging capability, significantly faster than the vivo T1’s 44W charging. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, while the T1 takes 38 minutes to reach 70%. Both phones have an endurance rating of 119h, indicating similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. The faster charging of the Poco X4 Pro 5G provides a significant convenience factor, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its superior chipset will provide a smoother, more responsive experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize fast charging, extended battery life, and a well-rounded feature set for everyday use. It’s ideal for users who want a reliable phone that can easily last a full day without needing a top-up.