vivo T1 vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro: A Detailed Showdown

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T1 and Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The vivo T1 edges out the Poco M4 Pro thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 778G chipset, resulting in smoother performance. While the Poco M4 Pro boasts impressive battery life and a bright display, the T1's processing power makes it the more appealing choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names	vivo T1	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International
4G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
5G bands	1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	-
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE
	CDMA2000 1x	1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India

Launch
Announced	2021, October 20	2022, February 28
Status	Available. Released 2021, November 01	Available. Released 2022, March 16

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)	159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	193 g (6.81 oz)	179.5 g (6.31 oz)
	-	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio)	6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ)	AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)	Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)
GPU	Adreno 642L	Mali-G57 MC2
OS	Android 11, OriginOS	Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO

Memory
Card slot	No	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM	64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Triple	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video	4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	HDR
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive	5.0, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	-	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Radio	No	FM radio, recording
USB	USB Type-C, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	44W wired, 70% in 38 min	33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min
Type	5000 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Aurora	Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow
Models	-	MZB0B5VIN, 2201117PI, 2201117PG
Price	About 300 EUR	€ 100.18
SAR	-	0.85 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.59 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 126h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 318444 (v9) GeekBench: 1836 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo T1

Faster Processor (Snapdragon 778G)
Good Value
Decent Camera
44W Fast Charging

Average Display Brightness
Camera can over-process images

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro

Exceptional Battery Life
Bright Display
Good Value
PD3.0, QC3 Charging Support

Slower Processor (Helio G96)
Camera not as consistent
Performance struggles with demanding games

Display Comparison

The Poco M4 Pro shines with its measured 737 nits max brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The contrast ratio is also impressive. The vivo T1's display is good, but lacks the Poco M4 Pro's peak brightness. Both offer FHD+ resolution, ensuring sharp visuals.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable camera systems, but neither excels. The Poco M4 Pro's camera is generally considered slightly better for still photography, offering more natural colors. The vivo T1's camera is decent, but can sometimes produce over-processed images. Video quality is comparable on both devices.

Performance

Here, the vivo T1 takes a clear lead. The Snapdragon 778G is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Helio G96. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the T1. The Poco M4 Pro is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding games.

Battery Life

The Poco M4 Pro boasts exceptional battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 126 hours. The vivo T1's battery is respectable, but doesn't match the Poco M4 Pro's longevity. The Poco M4 Pro also offers faster charging speeds (33W vs 44W), though the difference is minimal.

Buying Guide

The vivo T1 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and gaming. The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro is a better fit for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly price, even if it means sacrificing some processing speed.