The vivo T1 and Oppo Reno7 5G both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but approach it with different philosophies. The T1 prioritizes raw processing power with the Snapdragon 778G, while the Reno7 5G focuses on a balanced experience with the Dimensity 900 and a slightly more refined feature set. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo T1 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, particularly in gaming, and its 44W charging is reasonably quick. While the Oppo Reno7 5G boasts 65W charging and comparable battery endurance, the Dimensity 900 falls slightly behind in CPU-intensive tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1
- Stronger processor (Snapdragon 778G)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Competitive price point
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Display brightness and refresh rate unknown
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster charging (65W with 31min full charge)
- Reverse wired charging
- Brighter display (635 nits)
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 900)
- Potentially lower sustained performance
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 5G claims a victory in display quality with a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, suggesting better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo T1. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the Reno7’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) hints at a potentially superior panel, though real-world differences will depend on color calibration. The absence of refresh rate data for the T1 is a notable omission, potentially giving the Reno7 an advantage if it offers a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Reno7 5G’s brand reputation suggests a potentially more refined image processing pipeline. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Reno7, if present, would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and unlikely to deliver substantial image quality improvements.
Performance
The vivo T1’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a single 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, alongside three additional Cortex-A78 cores, provides a significant advantage over the Oppo Reno7 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 900. The Dimensity 900 utilizes two 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores but is paired with six less powerful Cortex-A55 cores. This difference translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the T1. While both chips are 6nm, the Snapdragon 778G’s architecture is more optimized for sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both the vivo T1 and Oppo Reno7 5G achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, their charging speeds differ significantly. The Oppo Reno7 5G’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the device in 31 minutes, while the vivo T1 takes 38 minutes to reach 70%. The Reno7 also offers reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. While the T1’s battery capacity is unknown, the Reno7’s faster charging mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 if you prioritize gaming performance, demanding app usage, and a more powerful processor for the price. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask or enjoy graphically intensive mobile games. Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G if you value faster charging speeds, a potentially more polished software experience (typical of Oppo’s ColorOS), and a balanced feature set, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 900 in the Oppo Reno7 5G throttle under sustained load, like during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 900 is a capable chip, it's known to exhibit more thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 778G in the vivo T1, especially during prolonged gaming. The T1’s more efficient architecture and potentially better thermal design should result in more consistent performance over time.
❓ Is the 65W charging on the Oppo Reno7 5G significantly faster in real-world use compared to the vivo T1’s 44W charging?
Yes, the 65W charging on the Reno7 5G is noticeably faster, achieving a full charge in 31 minutes versus 38 minutes for 70% on the T1. This difference is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the vivo T1 and Oppo Reno7 5G?
The vivo T1 likely runs Funtouch OS, while the Reno7 5G utilizes ColorOS. ColorOS is generally regarded as a more polished and feature-rich experience, with a wider range of customization options and software updates. However, Funtouch OS has improved in recent years and offers a clean interface.
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in gaming performance between these two phones?
Yes, you will likely notice a difference. The Snapdragon 778G in the vivo T1 provides a more powerful GPU and CPU, resulting in higher frame rates and smoother gameplay in demanding titles. The Dimensity 900 in the Reno7 5G is still capable, but will likely require lower graphics settings for optimal performance.
