vivo T1 vs OnePlus Nord 2T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the vivo T1’s Snapdragon 778G, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, significantly reducing downtime. While both boast 100-hour endurance ratings, the Nord 2T’s faster charging provides a practical advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T1 | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 38 min | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | - | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1
- Potentially more stable software experience due to Qualcomm chipset.
- May be available at a lower price point.
- Efficient power management from the Snapdragon 778G.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 1300.
- Slower charging speed (44W vs 80W).
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Faster and more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset.
- Significantly faster 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Mediatek chipsets sometimes face software optimization challenges.
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo T1.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the vivo T1 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio of the Nord 2T, the Nord 2T’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests a standard 60Hz or 120Hz refresh rate, but this isn't confirmed in the provided data. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified, making a direct comparison impossible.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering little insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of OnePlus typically emphasizes image processing and computational photography, potentially giving the Nord 2T an advantage in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to its low resolution and fixed focus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300, with its 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, demonstrably outperforms the vivo T1’s Snapdragon 778G (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78). The Dimensity 1300’s higher clock speeds and newer architecture translate to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. Both are built on a 6nm process, suggesting similar efficiency, but the Dimensity 1300’s superior CPU configuration provides a clear edge. RAM specifications are missing, but LPDDR5 is likely on both devices, further minimizing performance bottlenecks.
Battery Life
Both the vivo T1 and OnePlus Nord 2T achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging, with PD support, can reportedly charge from 0-100% much faster than the vivo T1’s 44W charging (70% in 38 minutes). This difference in charging speed is a significant convenience factor, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The actual battery capacity (mAh) is not specified, but the faster charging of the Nord 2T mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 if you prioritize a slightly more conservative, Qualcomm-backed chipset known for its stability and efficient power management, and if you find it at a significantly lower price point. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you demand faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and if rapid charging is a critical feature for your lifestyle. The Nord 2T is the better choice for power users.