The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the vivo T1, powered by the Snapdragon 778G, and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo T1 takes the lead thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset, delivering smoother performance and better gaming capabilities. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a slightly brighter display and impressive charging speeds, the T1's processing power makes it the overall winner for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Likely better gaming experience
- Sleek Design (typical of vivo)
- Camera potentially not as versatile as Redmi
- May lack some of Redmi's software features
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Excellent Battery Life (115h endurance rating)
- Bright Display (746 nits)
- Fast Charging (67W with PD3.0)
- Potentially more versatile camera system
- Weaker Processor (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Lower performance for demanding tasks
- Less smooth multitasking
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a slight edge with its measured 746 nits max brightness, making it more visible in direct sunlight. Both phones likely feature AMOLED displays offering vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the Redmi's higher brightness is noticeable. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio claim is nominal and doesn't provide concrete data.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G likely has a more versatile camera setup with potentially more lenses. However, the vivo T1's image processing could compensate, and the 778G's greater processing power may allow for better computational photography features.
Performance
This is where the vivo T1 truly shines. The Snapdragon 778G is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 695 5G found in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Expect smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the vivo T1. The T1's CPU configuration also contributes to its superior performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. Both phones support fast charging (66W and 67W respectively), allowing for quick top-ups. While the Redmi has a slight edge in endurance, the T1's faster charging could offset this.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, especially gamers and those who frequently multitask. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a great choice for those who value a bright display, long battery life, and fast charging, and are less concerned about raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo T1 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G have a better camera?
Potentially, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G might have a more versatile camera setup, but a full camera comparison is needed to confirm.
