The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T1 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo T1 takes the lead thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset, delivering smoother performance and better gaming. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts impressive battery life and a bright display, the T1's processing power makes it the overall winner for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Graphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star Blue |
| Models | - | 2201116TG, 2201116TI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 121.46 / £ 169.57 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9)
GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Fast Charging (66W)
- Sleek Design
- Good Value
- Camera may not be as good as Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Battery life slightly shorter than Redmi Note 11 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Excellent Battery Life
- Bright Display
- Good Camera
- Competitive Price
- Weaker Performance (Helio G96)
- Slower App Loading
- Less Powerful for Gaming
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro's 746 nits peak brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Redmi Note 11 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but the display is generally well-regarded. The vivo T1's display is also excellent, though slightly less bright.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The Redmi Note 11 Pro generally receives positive reviews for its camera quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The vivo T1's camera is also good, but may not match the Redmi Note 11 Pro's overall image quality. Low-light performance is likely similar on both.
Performance
This is where the vivo T1 truly shines. The Snapdragon 778G is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Helio G96. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the vivo T1. The Redmi Note 11 Pro is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding games.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro's endurance rating of 100h is impressive, suggesting exceptional battery life. The vivo T1, while not as long-lasting, still provides a full day of use with moderate usage. The 66W/67W charging speeds on both phones are comparable, allowing for quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 is ideal for users prioritizing performance, especially gamers and those who frequently multitask. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a great choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo T1 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro have a headphone jack?
Yes, the Redmi Note 11 Pro typically includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, a feature often missing in modern smartphones.
❓ Which phone has faster charging?
Both phones offer very similar charging speeds, with the Redmi Note 11 Pro having a slight edge with PD3.0 support.
