The vivo T1 and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro both pack the powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset, making them strong contenders in the mid-range smartphone market. But which one offers the better overall experience? We'll break down their key features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 Pro edges out the vivo T1 thanks to its brighter display, faster charging (including reverse charging), and slightly more refined software experience. Both offer excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 778G, but the Poco’s extra features give it a slight advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- Clean and streamlined software experience
- Potentially more compact design (depending on specific model)
- Good performance thanks to Snapdragon 778G
- Likely less bright display
- Slower charging speeds
- Less versatile camera system (potentially)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster 67W charging with reverse charging
- Potentially more versatile camera system
- Excellent battery life
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be polarizing
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 912 nits peak brightness compared to the vivo T1's likely lower brightness (specifications are not readily available, but generally vivo displays are not as bright). This makes the Poco X5 Pro a better choice for outdoor use and media consumption. Both likely feature AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera specifications are missing. Generally, the Poco X5 Pro tends to have a slightly more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. However, vivo often excels in color science and portrait mode.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 778G chipset and CPU configuration, meaning performance will be very similar in everyday tasks and gaming. Expect smooth multitasking and responsive app loading on both devices. Slight variations in software optimization could lead to minor differences in real-world performance, but they'll be negligible for most users.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The vivo T1's battery life is likely comparable, but the Poco's rating provides a stronger indication of longevity. The Poco X5 Pro also offers 67W wired charging and reverse wired charging, significantly faster than the vivo T1's 66W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 is a great choice for users prioritizing a clean software experience and potentially a slightly more compact design (depending on specific models). The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is ideal for those who want a vibrant display, faster charging speeds, and a few extra features like reverse charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G a good chipset?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a very capable mid-range chipset that offers excellent performance for everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
vivo generally provides timely software updates, but Xiaomi's MIUI has a larger community and often receives more frequent feature updates, though it can be more cluttered.
